AN SNP MSP has insisted the Bute House Agreement (BHA) has “run its course” and advised Humza Yousaf to pull out of the arrangement before the Greens do.
Christine Grahame told ITV Border the divergence between the parties’ priorities was now “too great” and it was in the interests of neither party for the governing partnership to continue.
The Greens are in the process of organising a vote on the future of the BHA amid fury from members over the Scottish Government’s decision to ditch a key climate target and back the pausing of prescriptions of puberty blockers for young trans people.
Grahame, who has been an MSP since 2011, said she would be “content” if the SNP were to revert back to a minority government and she would “prefer” it if her party initiated the split from the Greens than vice versa.
Asked about the BHA, she said: “I think it’s run its course. I’ve been here when we had a minority government and I think there’s such a divergence between what the Greens want and what the SNP are looking for.
READ MORE: Thousands more moving to Scotland than leaving after income tax raised
“I think the divergence is too great now and it’s in the interests of neither party to continue. So I’d be content if the SNP were to say ‘we’re going to work as a minority government’.”
Asked whether she would advise Yousaf to pull out of the agreement, she added: “Oh yes. I would prefer it to be us. I’ve preferred it to be us for quite a while.
'I think it's run its course'
— Representing Border (@ITVBorderRB) April 24, 2024
SNP MSP Christine Grahame tells @petermacmahon it's time to scrap the coalition between the SNP and the Greens. pic.twitter.com/ko9iv6SIxN
“The priorities for the Greens are very different from ours. I’m not talking about the economy, or ecology or the climate, I’m talking about other issues they have. We should not really continue in this arrangement.”
Patrick Harvie has said he will quit as Scottish Greens co-leader if his party vote to end its power sharing deal with the SNP.
In Westminster, outspoken SNP backbencher Joanna Cherry has called for the SNP rank and file to be given a vote on the agreement.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel