COULD the Tories find themselves by-election'd out of Government simply because they cannot hold onto their MPs?
It certainly seems like the Tories could find themselves in a Ship of Theseus-esque conundrum whereby their majority could slowly be chipped away and replaced with Labour MPs until they are a minority government.
The day after the 2019 General Election, then-Tory leader Boris Johnson commanded a beefy majority of 80 seats.
That has since dwindled to 49 – that’s nearly eight MPs gone from the Tory benches every year since.
At the present rate of calamity, it would be around six and a half years before the Conservatives found themselves without a working majority, by-election'd into catastrophe.
Happily for them, there will be another election before they have the chance to inflict that embarrassment on themselves.
READ MORE: The latest case of Tory sleaze depicts a party unfit to govern
Mark Menzies this week became the latest MP to inflict embarrassment on his party. The Scotsman – who represents Fylde in Lancashire – faces accusations of misusing party funds to pay off some “bad people”. Menzies denies the allegations.
He follows hot on the heels of William Wragg (above), who withdrew from the party after it emerged he gave the numbers of colleagues to the now-infamous Westminster honeytrapper.
Before him it was Lee Anderson (below), after he refused to apologise for incendiary and allegedly Islamophobic comments about the Mayor of London.
He said “Islamists” had “got control” of Sadiq Khan, who is a Muslim, adding: “He's actually given our capital city away to his mates.”
And before them there was the Tory MP who told a protester to “go back to Bahrain” outside that country’s embassy, there was David Warburton who admitted to taking drugs, Andrew Bridgen who compared the Covid vaccine to the Holocaust and Matt Hancock for his unsanctioned appearance on I’m a Celebrity….Get Me Out of Here, a television show in which contestants are forced to eat kangaroo testicles and get covered in bugs.
Actually, among this rogues’ gallery, our earlier thought experiment doesn’t seem so outlandish after all…
You can get the Worst of Westminster newsletter delivered straight to your inbox for FREE every Friday at 6pm by clicking here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel