THE SNP have called for the “unnecessary suffering” caused by the two-child benefit cap to end seven years on from its introduction.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has been urged to reflect on the damage critics say the policy has caused to families, and commit to scrapping it.
SNP MP Alison Thewliss said a potentially incoming Labour government should “grow a backbone” and scrap the policy if the Conservatives do not.
Labour have previously said they would not commit to scrapping the benefit unless it could be fully costed, however Sir Keir Starmer said his party would look to implement the policy “more fairly”.
The policy prevents families from claiming benefits for a third or subsequent children born after April 6, 2017. An associated so-called rape clause grants exemptions for a child born as a result of “non-consensual conception”.
The policy restricts child tax and Universal Credit, meaning families cannot claim around £3200 per year per additional child.
READ MORE: New figures show 90,000 Scots children hit by two-child benefit cap
Thewliss said: “For almost a decade, the two-child cap has caused so much unnecessary suffering for children and families across the UK, all to satisfy the Tories’ careless ideological austerity obsession.
“Despite overwhelming evidence that the policy has done nothing but impose severe harm on women and children, the Tories have remained wedded to it, revealing their wilful ignorance to the horrors of child poverty and rape in modern day Britain.”
Taking aim at Labour, she said Sir Keir’s party is “no better”.
She said: “Having repeatedly refused to commit to getting rid of the two-child cap if they win the next election, leading many to ask: what is the point of Labour?
“It’s been exactly seven years since the cruel policy was introduced and Sir Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak should reflect on the damage this policy has caused and commit to getting rid of it.
“Whilst it will be no surprise if the Tories ignore our call, given they seem incapable of showing decency or empathy to anyone but the mega-rich, we should expect Labour to grow a backbone and commit to making a lasting change overnight by ending, once and for all, the two-child cap and rape clause.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour students resign after liking Britain First tweets
A UK Government spokesperson said: “The two-child policy is about fairness, asking families on benefits to make the same financial decisions as families supporting themselves solely through work, and safeguards are in place to protect people in the most vulnerable circumstances.
“Our £108 billion cost-of-living support package prevented 1.3 million people falling into poverty in 2022/23, and we’re putting money back into people’s pockets by driving down inflation, cutting taxes, and increasing the National Living Wage.”
Scottish Labour’s health spokesman Paul O’Kane said: “While poverty rises under the SNP’s watch and waits for social security payments soar, they would rather attack Scottish Labour than set their own house in order.
“Labour is committed to reforming Universal Credit and making work pay with our transformative New Deal for Working People that will scrap zero-hours contracts and boost wages for thousands of Scots.
“An SNP government that sided with energy giants over working people cannot pretend to be on the side of working people.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel