A PATIENT in Scotland died after they were misdiagnosed with anxiety rather than a dangerous blood clot.
Anxiety can be mistaken for an pulmonary embolism, where a clot blocks arterial blood flow to the lungs. While there are similar symptoms, GPs are meant to take account of patients presenting with multiple risks associated with a pulmonary embolism and investigate further.
In this case, the unnamed Ayrshire GP should have taken further steps as the patient, named A in a report by the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO), had multiple risks around BMI levels, use of a prescribed combined oral contraceptive and their family’s medical history.
The patient’s parent had taken the case to the Ombudsman, with concerns that the diagnosis and treatment for anxiety had led to their death.
READ MORE: Housing payments of £90m to mitigate UK benefits cap
The patient had a telephone appointment with a GP due to shortness of breath, breathlessness and feeling faint when walking upstairs and when putting on their shoes.
The patient was diagnosed with anxiety and prescribed a beta blocker, a drug that blocks the action of hormones such as adrenaline to counter anxiety..
Later that week, the patient died suddenly due to pulmonary embolism, a blood clot that blocks and stops blood flow to an artery in the lung.
There were concerns that there was a delay in receiving proper treatment due to the anxiety diagnoses and that the medication prescribed was inappropriate, leading to greater harm.
The Ombudsman’s report stated: “We took independent advice from a GP adviser and subsequently from another GP adviser with a specialism in sexual and reproductive health.
“We found that there are numerous risk factors for pulmonary embolus and, in this case, the main risk factors were BMI, family medical history and prescription of combined oral contraceptive.
“Neither risk alone would preclude prescribing combined oral contraceptive, but consideration would be made for two risks, as in this case.
“We found that the health centre failed to provide A with reasonable medical care and treatment.”
The Ombudsman has ordered the medical practice to apologise for its failings.
The practice has also been told that patients presenting with similar symptoms should be carefully considered and that, where appropriate, face-to-face appointments should be offered.
They added that "prior to prescribing the combined oral contraceptive pill for patients who have two or more risk factors for pulmonary embolus, careful consideration should be given to the risk factors".
READ MORE: Scottish village in fear of 'aggressive' youth gang
The health centre has also been told to ensure that all complaints are handled in line with the NHS Model Complaints Handling Procedure (MCHP), particularly in terms of the requirement to respond in a timely manner.
Vicki Campbell, Head of Primary and Urgent Care Services, East Ayrshire Health and Social Care Partnership said: “I am sorry that we did not meet the high standards of care that we strive for in NHS Ayrshire and Arran for this patient, and offer my deepest condolences to their family.
“In addition to a formal apology to the family of patient A, I can advise that the GP practice has fully accepted the recommendations in the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) report.
“In order to ensure learning across the organisation, we will share the findings from the report with staff and assurance to our clinical governance teams that the necessary actions have been completed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel