THE Presiding Officer was forced to intervene in a fiery clash between Humza Yousaf and Anas Sarwar after the First Minister accused the Labour MSP of “arrogance and hubris”.
Sarwar had brought up Yousaf’s record in government at FMQs on Thursday, which marked one year since the SNP leader was formally chosen as First Minister by MSPs.
The Scottish Labour group leader accused Yousaf of having “no vision, no strategy and no plan [and] failing on the basics of government”.
He went on: “In health, NHS waiting lists have gone up in the past year, with tens of thousands of more people added. On the economy, a complete failure to deliver growth and businesses struggling and cancelling investment.
“In justice, green-lighting plans to let crimes go uninvestigated and police stations closing across the country. In education, standards falling, violence rising and teacher numbers being cut.”
Sarwar then asked: “After just a year in the job how can Scotland afford another two years of this?”
In his response, the SNP leader pointed to policies that analysis has found will lift 100,000 Scots children out of poverty compared to if they were only living under the Westminster government.
Yousaf also pointed to NHS staff strike action in England and Wales, where it has been avoided in Scotland, and growth in “key economic indicators under this government” such as GDP and private-sector employment.
The First Minister added: “And what is Anas Sarwar's record? The only consistency over the last year is that he is completely inconsistent.
“U-turned, dumped every single principle or policy and fallen into line behind Keir Starmer.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf responds to VisitScotland plans to close all tourist centres
Sarwar then began listing criticism of Yousaf from other figures within the SNP.
He mentioned Pete Wishart’s criticism of the “Tory-free Scotland” slogan, Kate Forbes’s suggestion that Yousaf lacked a “big vision,” and Alex Neil’s claim that the SNP’s General Election strategy is “mince”.
Yousaf then plunged the chamber into chaos after he accused Sarwar of displaying “his famed arrogance and hubris … taking the people of Scotland for granted”.
Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone had to intervene as the Conservative benches joined the jeers led by Sarwar from the Labour side.
After calm, Yousaf went on: “When it comes to vision, let me remind Anas Sarwar it was just last week that his colleagues in UK Labour were praising Margaret Thatcher for her vision.
“In the year that I have been First Minister, I can stand here and say that I have stood by my values and my principles.
“Those values and those principles will see an estimated 100,000 children lifted out of poverty.
“Those values will see record investment in our NHS, record numbers of junior doctors joining the NHS.
“They have seen the implementation of a fully funded council tax freeze – despite Labour's best efforts to thwart it.
“Those values have seen private sector employment grow in Scotland higher than any other UK nation.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour overruled by UK leadership on supporting WASPI women
“And as I say, the only consistency Anas Sarwar has is inconsistency … most shamefully is the latest betrayal of the WASPI women that Annas Sarwar promised to campaign for and he's now turned his back on. Unforgivable. The WASPI woman won't forget, nor will they forgive.”
In 2019, Labour pledged to compensate the “WASPI” women who lost out amid changes to the state pension age.
However, now an ombudsman has said those women do deserve compensation, the party is refusing to commit to it.
Scottish Labour has also still not issued a statement in response to multiple UK Labour frontbenchers praising Margaret Thatcher.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel