A PROJECT which will bring enough clean Scottish electricity to England to power around two million homes has been given the go-ahead from Ofgem for a £3.4 billion funding package.
The high voltage power cable – billed as an “electricity superhighway” – will connect Peterhead in Aberdeenshire to Drax in North Yorkshire when it is completed in 2029.
It is part of the efforts looking to ensure that not only are wind farms built but they are also connected to the towns and cities which need their electricity.
At the moment, what could be described as congestion on the grid means that wind farms that could be producing energy because it is windy have to shut down because there is not enough capacity to carry their power to places where it could be used.
READ MORE: UK Government urges U-turn after VisitScotland announces information centre closures
Because of the way that contracts with wind farms work, they are paid when they are asked to shut down because of such congestion.
So far in March, payments to wind farms that have been asked to shut down have totalled nearly £50 million, according to the UK Wind Curtailment Monitor, an online tool.
The new 500-kilometre cable will help reduce the time that wind farms have to shut down even when they can produce.
It is the second such project to win approval from Ofgem under a new fast-track programme designed to help the UK connect all the wind farms it plans to build over the years to come.
It follows approval for a £2bn cable between East Lothian and County Durham, which was granted earlier this month.
There are 26 projects “identified as critical” if the UK is to meet the Government’s target of having 50 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030.
If all of these are built “by their optimal delivery dates,” Ofgem expects consumers to benefit to the tune of £2.1bn, in part because of the money saved by not having to pay wind farms to stand idle.
The two gigawatt cable approved on Wednesday will run mainly on the bottom of the North Sea, but around 70 kilometres of it will be buried underground.
A report from the Electricity Systems Operator, which runs the grid, last week claimed that £58bn of additional grid investments would be needed in the first half of the 2030s.
It warned that while offshore and underground cables are less likely to run into local opposition from people worried their views will be ruined, they are considerably more expensive than the alternative.
Ofgem said that it had scrutinised the plans for the new cable closely and had forced the developers to cut £67 million from their costs. That cut would not impact the project delivery or quality, the regulator said.
“Just because we’ve streamlined the approval process doesn’t mean we’re handing developers blank cheques,” said Ofgem’s director of major projects Rebecca Barnett.
She said that the framework Ofgem uses “helps ensure consumers are protected from unnecessary costs and we make budget adjustments where we don’t see maximum efficiency and benefit for consumers”.
Barnett added: “To ensure we meet future energy demand and achieve Government net zero targets we must speed up the expansion of the high voltage electricity network which connects consumers to homegrown energy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel