A COMMITTEE of MSPs has backed the increase to the minimum unit price of alcohol as a minister urged councils to spend Government funding on addiction services.
The change in alcohol pricing will see the floor rise from 50p to 65p from September 30.
At a meeting of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee on Tuesday, eight MSPs on the committee voted in favour and the two Tory representatives voted against.
The increase will now be put before the whole chamber before it is passed.
READ MORE: Mark Blyth: Unionists 'taking my words on independence out of context'
Opponents have questioned data on the impact of the policy, with alcohol-related deaths in 2022 at the highest level since 2008, but Alcohol and Drug Minister Christina McKelvie (below) stressed the move should not be treated as a “silver bullet”.
“No single intervention in issues as complex as alcohol harm would be,” she said.
“From some findings in the Public Health Scotland (PHS) evaluation, it was clear that some people who were alcohol dependent had experienced additional challenges linked to the price of alcohol increasing.
“I know that specialist support and treatment is vital for these people.”
The Scottish Government has provided a “record” funding settlement for alcohol and drug partnerships (ADPs) across the country of £112 million, she said, adding that ministers expect the money to be spent on addiction services.
“I’m absolutely clear that the budget we have provided for ADPs this year gets spent on ADPs,” McKelvie said.
“My direction, I think if I have to go that far, will be that that money is spent on ADPs and the work that they have to do, including the very detailed work they do with dependent drinkers.”
The increase may also become a regular feature of minimum unit pricing (MUP), according to the minister, who said officials in her department were at the early stages of considering an annual increase to the rate which would be linked to an inflationary index.
READ MORE: DLC: Taymouth Castle developers ditch golf garage plans after outcry
Speaking against the move, Scottish Tory health spokesperson Sandesh Gulhane said: “Whilst the minister has spoken many times to say this is not the silver bullet, it’s nuanced and there’s lots of other things that need to be done, the facts are nothing else is being done – this is the Government’s silver bullet.
“This is the only thing that they seem to be doing when it comes to the area of alcohol.
“We simply need to see more treatment occurring, because that is proven to reduce people’s dependence on alcohol, it’s also proven to reduce deaths and improve lives and save lives.”
He also urged the Scottish Government to back his party’s Right to Recovery Bill.
The minister rejected the claim nothing else was being done.
Dr Alastair MacGilchrist, chairman of Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems, welcomed the news, saying MUP has “been shown to save lives”.
“The debate has often become heated, but the overwhelming consensus is that MUP is a vital tool to tackle the harms and deaths caused by alcohol in Scotland on a daily basis,” he added.
“I am delighted that the Health Committee has listened to the evidence and made clear its view, and encourage MSPs of all parties to act on this when the vote in the Scottish Parliament takes place in the coming weeks.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel