SNP councillors have threatened to report a Conservative representative to the police amid allegations of racism.
The row on Stirling Council centres around allegations of racism, bullying and misconduct by former provost Douglas Dodds – a Conservative who was handed the top council role after striking a deal with Labour.
Dodds resigned as both provost and a councillor in November 2023 citing “personal and health reasons”.
However, emails obtained by SNP councillor Gerry McLaughlan through freedom of information laws showed the Tory had been at the centre of allegations of racism just one week before he left.
READ MORE: Tory MSP threatens legal action as police log his Twitter post as 'hate incident'
The SNP group in Stirling said the emails showed “an internal investigation was pending over alleged misconduct in office, including questions over gifts, potential abuses of hospitality, and alleged racist behaviour”.
In heated exchanges during a Special Council Meeting last week, an SNP motion urged councillors across the chamber to support a formal referral to the Ethical Standards Commissioner.
However, Labour and Conservative councillors voted to protect the former Provost.
McLaughlan said: “It’s truly sad it has come to this.
“Referring these allegations to the police is the least we can do to demonstrate Stirling has no time for racism or bullies.”
Stirling SNP group leader Scott Farmer said: “These are truly serious allegations – the thought that anyone may have lost their job at our council due to racism or discrimination makes my blood boil.
“Tory [group] leader Neil Benny did nothing as the Provost he voted in made a mockery of the title and public office.”
He added: “Once again, Labour and the Tories have closed ranks to protect one of their own. SNP Councillors cannot stand by and condone this sort of behaviour, and we trust communities across Stirling will be rightly appalled.”
The Scottish Tories have been asked for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel