A FLAT fare bus trial has been announced by the Scottish Government following a review of the cost of public transport.
On Friday, Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop (below) announced recommendations set out by the Fair Fares review, launched in 2021 under the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens.
In addition to a flat fare for bus trips, the review recommended that under-22s get free inter-island foot passengers travel in the Western Isles, Orkney and Shetland, as well as an extension of the National Ferry Scheme – which allows for four free single trips to or from the mainland a year – for 18 to 21-year-olds.
The review also includes a pilot scheme to extend free rail travel to the companions of eligible blind people.
READ MORE: Scotland contributed £14bn MORE to UK coffers over last decade, study shows
It is not yet clear where the flat fares bus trial is set to take place, but it follows on from decisions to give free bus travel for the over-60s and under-22s.
In England, a £2 cap on bus journeys was introduced last year and has been extended to December. Meanwhile, Lothian – Edinburgh's main bus operator – has £2 flat single fares across the city.
The Fair Fares report stated: “We will develop a proposal for a bus flat fares pilot for an area-based scheme to provide flat fares on bus travel, or reduced fares on zonal integrated travel for consideration in future budgets.”
READ MORE: Shifa - Civilians trapped after five-day siege of a Gaza hospital
Launching the trial on Friday, Hyslop said: “The recommendations and actions set out today will help us to ensure we have an available, affordable and accessible public transport system which enables people to make positive and proactive travel choices which result in using their cars less.”
Scottish Greens transport spokesperson Mark Ruskell (below) said: “A trial fares cap on buses will give the Government the evidence to consider bigger changes for all passengers.”
Yet the review has drawn criticism, as sustainable transport campaigners Transform Scotland said it failed to set out how ministers planned to curb car use to meet their target of a 20% reduction by 2030.
Director Colin Howden said: “We’re pleased the [Scottish] Government has agreed with us that action needs to be taken to address the cost of motoring relative to the price of public transport.
"Over the last two decades, public transport costs have not only risen relative to costs of driving, but considerably above the rate of inflation.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf heads to Inverclyde to celebrate council tax freeze
“These price signals have encouraged people to drive and discouraged them from taking public transport.
"We see no prospect of transformational change unless and until it’s clearly cheaper to take public transport rather than use private cars.
“But it’s disappointing the review doesn’t set out how this will be tackled, instead kicking the can down the road to the traffic reduction plan, which is itself badly overdue."
Scottish Conservatives transport spokesperson Graham Simpson said: “This is a real disappointment. The SNP had the opportunity to announce some immediate actions that could make a real difference bit instead and as usual, everything is kicked down the road.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel