THE Chancellor of the Exchequer has been slammed for suggesting £100,000 is "not a huge salary" in his constituency if you have a mortgage.
Jeremy Hunt made the remark at the end of a social media post about some phone conversations he had with constituents – and social media users have shared their anger with one mockingly describing Hunt as a "man of the people".
In a list of conversations he reportedly had, Hunt listed a discussion with a woman from Godalming in his constituency of South West Surrey.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour overruled by UK party on WASPI women support
He said the woman had enquired about the UK Government's childcare offer – which families are not eligible for if one parent is earning more than £100,000.
Hunt wrote: "That is an issue I would really like to sort out after the next election as I am aware that it is not huge salary in our area if you have a mortgage to pay."
☎️Constituency Calls ☎️
— Jeremy Hunt (@Jeremy_Hunt) March 22, 2024
My first call was to Rosemary French, President of the Cranleigh Chamber of Commerce to talk about the planned changes to the High Street. She talked to me about the problems of the pavements not being wide enough, the huge success of street markets and… pic.twitter.com/A5zupGOCsE
The UK’s median gross annual salary for full-time employees was £34,963 in April 2023, according to the Office for National Statistics.
Jonathan Portes, professor of economics at King's College London and a senior fellow with UK In A Changing Europe, reacted to the post: "Issue: Jeremy Hunt would 'really like to sort out after election' free childcare for someone earning over £100k because 'it's not a huge salary'. Issue: Jeremy Hunt couldn't care less about sorting out 3.7 million people (government stats) who can't afford to buy food for their families."
Elsewhere, senior analyst Ross Mudie – for think tank Centre for Progressive Policy – wrote: "If a £100k salary is too low to handle the costs of childcare and housing, then perhaps we need to be looking very seriously at what we can do to reduce the costs of both, quickly."
Another social media user wrote: "Why doesn’t the lady in Godalming just get a second job? Or try using supermarket own brand food? Or make dinner for 30p? Like the Tories tell all the poor northern people to do?"
One person wrote: "How absolutely crass to suggest that £100k salary is not huge!" as another added: "In what world is £100,000 not a huge salary?"
READ MORE: Scotland contributed £14bn MORE to UK coffers over last decade, study shows
Later, shadow paymaster general Jonathan Ashworth said: “The Chancellor has again revealed how desperately out of touch the Tories are with working people when he claims someone earning £100,000 a year is not a ‘huge salary’.
“The overwhelming majority of working people in this country would dream of earning that, yet they are all being made to pay the price of 14 years of Tory failure.
“It is staggering for the Chancellor to complain about mortgage costs when it was the Conservatives who crashed the economy with their kamikaze budget and sent mortgage costs through the roof."
In his Budget earlier this month, Mr Hunt announced an increase in the threshold at which the high-income child benefit charge starts from £50,000 to £60,000 from April.
He also announced that partial child benefit would be paid where the highest earner earns up to £80,000.
Working parents can receive free childcare for youngsters aged three and four. To qualify, the majority must earn more than £8,670, but less than £100,000 per year under current rules.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel