RISHI Sunak was among the MPs to burst into laughter at PMQs after Stephen Flynn’s first question took aim at both the Tories and Labour.
The SNP Westminster group leader used his opening contribution to needle the Prime Minister about reported backbench plans to replace him, as well as Labour Party frontbenchers after several of them sang the praises of Margaret Thatcher.
Flynn asked Sunak: “With his backbenchers looking for a unity candidate to replace him, which of the now numerous, born-again Thacherites on the Labour frontbench does he believe best fits the bill?”
Responding, Sunak said it had been “surprising” to hear talk from Labour MPs including shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves about the UK in the 1970s.
However, Flynn insisted there was a “serious point to be made”.
He said: “The IFS [Institute for Fiscal Studies] have warned of the ‘conspiracy of silence’ which exists between the Labour Party and the Conservative Party when it comes to £18 billion of looming public sector cuts.
“Just last night the [the IFS] actually outlined that the fiscal rules of the Labour Party and the Conservative Party are ‘in effect, identical’.
“So with such continuity on offer, the public are right to be anti-Westminster, aren't they?”
Responding, Sunak said he was “surprised to hear him quoting the IFS,” pointing out that the think tank had also described the Scottish Government budget as “misleading”.
The IFS had said the Scottish Government’s Budget did not increase health spending year-on-year as was claimed, when in-year top-ups were included.
During his questions at PMQs, Labour leader Keir Starmer took aim at the Conservatives over the timing of a General Election and the Rwanda deportation plan.
The Labour leader told the Commons: “Violent prisoners released early because the Tories wrecked the criminal justice system, 3500 small boats arrivals already this year because the Tories lost control of the borders, the NHS struggling to see people because the Tories broke it, millions paying more on their mortgages, a budget that hit pensioners, a £46bn hole in his sums.
“Why is the Prime Minister so scared to call an election?”
Sunak replied: “My working assumption is that the election will be in the second half of the year.
“I must say, I thought that out of everybody he would actually be the most grateful, because he has now actually got time to come up with a plan for Britain.”
READ MORE: BBC 'made mistake' in coverage of ICJ genocide case against Israel, top official admits
Starmer also said: “The Rwanda gimmick is going to cost the taxpayer £2 million for every one of the 300 people that they deport.
“I know the Prime Minister likes to spend a lot on jet-setting but that’s some plane ticket. It’s the cost of Tory chaos and it’s working people who are paying the price.”
He added: “We know the Prime Minister himself thought it wouldn’t work. If the people selling this gimmick don’t believe in it, why should the country?”
Sunak responded: “When it comes to this question of how to deal with people who are here illegally, [Labour's] values are simply not those of the British people.
“After all, this is the person who campaigned to stop the deportation of foreign dangerous criminals. A dangerous criminal was jailed for dealing class A drugs after he fought to keep him here, a gang master was convicted of carrying a knife after he fought to keep him here.
“So, whether he’s representing terrorists or campaigning for criminals, it’s clear whose side he’s on, and it’s not the British people’s.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel