A CAP should be introduced to limit the amount individuals and campaign groups can donate to political parties, the Scottish Greens have argued.
The call comes as the Tory party faces continued condemnation over donations by millionaire businessman Frank Hester, who is reported to have said veteran MP Diane Abbott - Britain's first female black MP - made him "want to hate all black women" and “should be shot”.
Hester has donated at least £10 million to the party and the Tories are coming under continued pressure to hand back the cash.
But Transport Secretary Mark Harper said on Sunday “the donation stands” as he defended keeping hold of the money.
Energy minister Graham Stuart also defended Hester last week as he said he was “hesitant” to describe Hester’s comments as racist.
READ MORE: BBC: Humza Yousaf defends Scotland's higher taxes in Martin Geissler spat
The Prime Minister eventually described Hester’s comments as “racist” after initially refusing to do so.
Tortoise Media has reported Hester has donated another £5m to the party on top of the confirmed £10m, but it has not yet been declared. Gifts made up until March do not have to published until June, but the Conservative Party has not denied the additional payment.
The Greens have insisted there must now be strict new rules to curb the impact and influence of wealthy donors on politics.
The party has also suggested there should be a cap on the amount parties can spend during an election.
Green MSP Maggie Chapman insisted the “shameful saga” around Hester illustrates why the influence of the super-rich must be stemmed.
He said: “Frank Hester’s remarks were grotesque, and it is utterly shameful that the Tories have still not returned his dirty money, but the problem is much wider than Hester and his racist and misogynistic comments.
“It’s the whole broken system for party funding. When wealthy individuals give huge sums of money to political parties they aren’t doing it to be nice, they’re doing it to secure influence and power, and it works.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf vows to campaign in 'every constituency' in Scotland
“The Tory Party clearly won’t stand up to the people who are bankrolling them or risk doing anything that may lose their support - that is why so many ministers have been so prepared to defend Mr Hester.
“This whole shameful saga emphasises why we must curb the influence of the super-rich, rather than allowing them to dominate so much of our politics.
“The system is broken and it is fundamentally undemocratic. It has put far too much power in the hands of a small number of dodgy donors and cronies. That is why we need hard caps on how much can be donated by individuals or campaign groups and how much parties can spend on elections.”
In 2011, the Committee and Standards on Public Life recommended a £10,000 a year cap on individual donations, and has subsequently called for a series of reforms to increase transparency.
Analysis by The Independent in 2021 showed just 10 wealthy people accounted for a quarter of all donations made by individuals to the Conservative Party.
Chapman added: “It is 13 years since the Committee and Standards on Public Life recommended a £10,000 a year cap on individual donations. It was totally ignored by the UK Government. The problem has got worse since then.”
Political parties in 2023 accepted more than £22m in donations and public funds during the final quarter of 2023, according to the Electoral Commission, with just under half of that received by the Tories (£9.7m).
In total across the year, more than £93m was accepted by parties – a staggering 81% increase.
In the final quarter of last year, Labour accepted more than £8.5m, the LibDems received £2.7m, the SNP accepted £387,184 and the Scottish Greens took £46,233.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel