SPAIN’S parliament yesterday approved an amnesty bill aimed at forgiving crimes – both proven and alleged – committed by Catalan independence activists during a chaotic attempt to hold an independence referendum six years ago.
Socialist prime minister Pedro Sanchez has promoted the amnesty as a way to move past the 2017 secession attempt by the then-leaders of Catalonia.
But the bill has also met opposition from millions of Spaniards who believe that the people who provoked one of Spain’s biggest political crises should face charges including embezzlement and promoting public disorder.
Sanchez has already pardoned nine jailed Catalan independence leaders, a move that helped heal wounds at little political cost. But the amnesty is proving to be much more divisive.
The bill was passed by 178-172 votes in favour in the 350-seat lower house of parliament in Madrid.
A crisis erupted in 2017, when the Catalan government led by Carles Puigdemont staged a referendum on independence, defying orders from the national government and a ruling from Spain’s top court that doing so violated the constitution. Madrid sent in police in an attempt to stop the referendum, which was opposed by protests that turned violent.
The Catalan parliament declared independence on October 27 that year but it failed to garner any international support. Puigdemont and several other senior officials later fled Spain.
Hundreds or thousands of people in Catalonia face the threat of prosecutions related to the referendum or protests, and Puigdemont and other leaders remain abroad.
Recent court investigations have accused the former president of terrorism for allegedly masterminding massive protests that clashed violently with police and closed roads, train lines and the Barcelona airport in 2019.
Sanchez agreed to the amnesty to secure the backing of two Catalan independence parties, after an inconclusive national election last July turned them into kingmakers.
The conservative opposition accuses Sanchez (below) of selling out the rule of law in exchange for another term in the Moncloa Palace and has organised major street protests during recent months.
Socialist party parliamentary spokesperson Patxi Lopez defended the bill yesterday as a move to seek a page-turning “reconciliation” with Catalonia.
The opposition Popular Party (PP) leader Alberto Nunez Feijoo hit back saying that “this is not reconciliation but submission”.
It was not clear whether the deal would add stability to Sanchez’s minority government: Junts, a pro-independence party led by Puigdemont, said Sanchez owed them the amnesty for having supported his bid to stay in power, and that their potential backing of his policies would depend on what they could get in return.
The bill still faces a number of procedural steps before becoming law. The Senate of Spain, which has a conservative majority is expected to reject it, which would mean that parliament’s lower house would have to vote for it a second time to push it through.
Sanchez’s party has had a hard time crafting a bill that satisfies the separatists and which will surely be highly scrutinised by the courts.
Parliament rejected an earlier version of the bill in late January when Junts said it did not do enough to protect Puigdemont.
The bill then went back to a parliamentary committee, where it was tweaked to suit Junts’ needs. Puigdemont now lives in Belgium, where he has become a European Parliament member. A fugitive from Spanish justice, he calls himself a political exile.
Yesterday’s vote came a day after Catalonia’s leader Pere Aragones called early elections.
That decision added more uncertainty to Spanish politics and led to Sanchez cancelling plans for a 2024 budget because of the difficulty he would have had trying to get the support of the two separatist parties during election time.
The Spanish government says the amnesty could help hundreds of people, while the pro-independence Catalan organisation Omnium Cultural says it should benefit some 4400 people, mostly minor officials and ordinary citizens who either helped to organise the referendum or participated in protests.
The application of the amnesty would be decided by the courts on a case-by-case basis.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel