KEIR Starmer has been accused of "not being honest" about cuts a Labour government would impost on public services - after he repeatedly dodged the question on Sky News.
The Labour leader appeared on Politics Hub with Sophie Ridge on Monday evening where he was grilled on whether he was going "to tax more, borrow more, or are you going to become the austerity Prime Minister?"
It comes after a Labour MP warned under Starmer's plans, the party "will end up being the midwives of austerity 2.0, which will be a disaster for the country". Senior Labour Party figures have repeatedly dodged questions over the cuts, despite backing the Tory budget and Tory fiscal rules.
Starmer refused to answer Ridge when she asked, saying "let's be honest with what we are going to inherit." He said: "What we learned last week was a terrible incitement of 14 years in government -"
READ MORE: UNRWA: Scottish minister calls on UK Government to resume funding
Starmer was interrupted by Ridge, saying she didn't have long and wanted him to "be honest with people" and tell the public if he "would become the austerity prime minister" if he won the General Election.
The Labour leader again failed to answer, instead focussing on planning regulations and Ridge vented frustration at his failure to respond. She responded: "oh come on, councils are going bust now."
When he tried to dodge the question again, Ridge said: "What are you going to do straight away if you're in Number 10? Be Honest. Are you going to borrow more or are you going to enact austerity?"
📷 Watch as Keir Starmer refuses to answer when asked: "Are you going to tax more, borrow more, or are you going to become the austerity Prime Minister?" pic.twitter.com/PPRPFvjWzw
— The National (@ScotNational) March 12, 2024
She later added: "The IFS has said £20 billion of cuts to public services and you're not being honest about what you're going to do. This is your chance - tell people."
The IFS has warned the UK budget implies a real-terms cut to net public sector investment of more than 25% (£18 billion) between 2024–25 and 2028–29 and up to £25 billion on a spending per person basis.
It has accused the Tories and Labour Party of a "conspiracy of silence" over the cuts, warning “Government and opposition are joining in a conspiracy of silence in not acknowledging the scale of the choices and trade-offs that will face us after the election. They, and we, could be in for a rude awakening when those choices become unavoidable.”
Commenting, SNP Economy spokesperson Drew Hendry MP said: "Sir Keir Starmer is not being honest about the massive cuts the Labour Party will impose on public services after he recklessly chose to back the Tory budget and Tory fiscal rules.
"The next UK government will have a choice. It can either reject austerity and invest in public services - or it can cut them to the bone. People in Scotland will be appalled that Starmer has chosen to copy the Tories and take the axe to public services.
"It's not only hugely damaging for the services we all rely on - it's also economically illiterate. The UK economy is broken because it's been hammered by Brexit and starved of investment. Now, Starmer's austerity plans will make it even worse - choking off growth."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel