THE Scottish Government has branded new Tory spending plans a “betrayal” of public services – amid grim predictions of spending cuts.
Finance Secretary Shona Robison accused the UK Government of providing “not a single penny more” for investment in Scotland.
And she raised concerns there was “no detail on where cuts will fall”.
Announcing the Spring Budget on Wednesday, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt committed the Government to increasing day-to-day public spending by 1%.
But a leading expert has warned this will result in major cuts across the public sector, except in protected areas.
Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank, said because there were “bigger increases nailed in for health, defence, and childcare” other parts of the state would need to be trimmed.
He said his calculations said this would result in cuts worth £20bn per year until 2028 in the unprotected areas.
READ MORE: Jeremy Hunt snubs Scottish Tory pleas with windfall tax extension in Budget
Reacting to the Budget, Robison (below) said: “Public services up and down the UK are in real need of investment, and they’re being sacrificed to deliver unsustainable tax cuts.”
It comes after the Chancellor announced he was trimming National Insurance payments by 2%, to be funded in part by increased duties on vapes and tobacco – as well as a controversial extension of the North Sea oil and gas windfall tax.
Robison added: “Today’s UK Spring Budget is nothing short of a betrayal of public services across the UK. Our hope had been the Chancellor would have eased pressures on services – not least by providing more funding for capital.
“This would have helped support our NHS and the delivery of more affordable housing, but it would also have created jobs and economic growth, as well as helping secure a just transition to net zero.
“When more support is desperately needed for public services and infrastructure, for greater cost of living measures, and for money to aid our efforts to reduce carbon emissions – Scotland has been badly let down by the UK Government.”
She raised concerns about a lack of capital funding – which is spent on major state investments in things like building new infrastructure.
“Today’s statement provides not a single penny more for capital funding,” she added.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross vows to rebel on windfall tax
“And the Barnett consequentials from health that were signalled by the Chancellor are actually less than the in-year health consequentials of 2023-24 and less than what is needed to address the pressures we face.
“I can guarantee that this Scottish Government will not be passing on this UK Government cut to our NHS.
“The National Insurance cut fails to offset the crippling effects of the cost of living crisis.
“There is also little detail of the spending cuts needed to pay for it. Even before today’s Spring Budget the Institute for Government described [the UK Government's] spending plans as a ‘fantasy’, with no detail on where cuts will fall.
“Today’s statement merely adds to that: according to the UK Government's own financial watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility, the Treasury may not even have the headroom available that today's commitments are based on.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel