BROADCAST regulator Ofcom has ruled a “misogynistic” tirade by former GB News presenter Laurence Fox against a female journalist was “degrading and demeaning”.
GB News bosses have been summoned to talks with the media watchdog after Fox unleashed a vile attack on political journalist Ava Evans.
Speaking after her on a show broadcast in September, Fox said: “Show me a single self-respecting man that would like to climb into bed with that woman ever.”
He added: "Who would want to s**g that?”
He was sacked from his position at GB News, along with Calvin Robinson, who defended Fox.
Laurence Fox just did a whole speech on GB News on why men apparently won’t shag me ? pic.twitter.com/XoQD0DUQVm
— Ava-Santina (@AvaSantina) September 26, 2023
Dan Wootton – on whose show Fox made the comments – was subject to an internal investigation and suspended. He has not appeared on GB News since.
In its ruling, Ofcom wrote: “We found that Mr Fox’s comments constituted a highly personal attack on Ms Evans and were potentially highly offensive to viewers.
“They reduced her contribution to a broadcast discussion on mental health – in her professional capacity as a political journalist – to a judgment on whether she, or women like her who publicly expressed their political opinions, were sexually desirable to men.
READ MORE: GB News launches investigation after 'totally unacceptable' Laurence Fox comments
“As such, we considered that Mr Fox’s comments were degrading and demeaning both to Ms Evans and women generally and were clearly and unambiguously misogynistic.”
Wootton also came in for criticism for failing to challenge Fox. Ofcom said: “In our view, Mr Wootton’s reaction and limited challenge in response did not mitigate the potential for offence.
“Rather, they exacerbated it by contributing to the narrative in which a woman’s value was judged by her physical appearance.”
It added: “Taking into particular account that Mr Fox’s misogynistic comments were directed at an individual, went largely unchallenged by the presenter, and the absence of any apology in the programme itself, we do not consider that the significant potential for offence was justified by the context in this case.”
READ MORE: Support pours in for journalist Ava Evans after Laurence Fox comments
Ofcom said it had found GB News to be in breach of its rules requiring broadcasters to justify “offensive language” with context.
The regulator said the episode had raised “significant concerns about GB News’ editorial control of its live output”.
It added: “We are requiring GB News to provide further detailed information about its compliance practices in this area for our consideration, and requesting it attends a meeting at our offices to discuss this.”
Evans spoke about her reaction to Fox’s comments in September last year, saying she had been left “really hurt by it”.
She said: “Do you know this is the sort of talk that you worry that men have about you when you’re not in the room. There is always sort of a worry in the back of your mind which is, ‘are people actually interested in what I’m saying or what I’m doing?’
“Or are they just looking at me … physically and I think that that clip proves that there are some men who are.”
GB News was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel