FIRST Minister Humza Yousaf, alongside the Justice Secretary, will meet the mother of murder victim Emma Caldwell next week, the Scottish Government has confirmed.
It follows the conviction of Iain Packer who was jailed for life with a minimum term of 36 years on Wednesday after being found guilty at the High Court in Glasgow of murdering the 27-year-old in 2005.
He was also convicted of 11 rapes and 21 further charges including sexual assaults and abduction, involving multiple women, over 26 years.
Scotland’s Justice Secretary Angela Constance (below) said: “Our thoughts are with Margaret Caldwell and Emma’s friends for their tragic loss, and to the many victims in this horrendous case.
“For Margaret Caldwell and the other victims in this case, justice has taken far too long.
“As the First Minister has very clearly stated, we are giving serious consideration and are open to a judge-led public inquiry.
READ MORE: Sunak slammed for 'authoritarian statements' over protest crackdown
“He was also clear that he wants to hear directly from Margaret Caldwell before we take any decision and the First Minister and I will meet with her next week.”
Margaret Caldwell ‘looking forward’ to meeting with Yousaf
Solicitor Aamer Anwar, who has represented Emma Caldwell’s mother Margaret Caldwell since 2016, said his client is looking forward to meeting with Yousaf and Constance next week.
Anwar said he will meet with Yousaf and Constance to reiterate calls for a judge-led public inquiry.
The solicitor said the failures to investigate Caldwell’s murder was “the worst scandal to ever hit our justice system”.
He said: “We welcome the First Minister agreeing to meet with Emma’s mother Margaret, Emma’s brother Jamie and myself next week.
READ MORE: Councillor hits out at 'misogynistic' Inverclyde council tax meeting
“As Margaret said after the verdict, the police have apologised after nearly 19 years, but that is not good enough.
“In that time six of the 25 victims died never to see justice.
“How many more do we not know of?
“For Emma’s family, nothing less than a fully independent public inquiry will suffice – this is the worst scandal to ever hit our justice system and the police or Crown Office cannot be allowed to investigate itself, escape scrutiny or accountability.
“Mrs Caldwell looks forward to meeting with Mr Yousaf [below] and says that if he genuinely cares about the victims then he has no other option but to organise a judge-led public inquiry that acts without fear or favour – that is the very least her Emma and the many women who spoke up deserve, for far too long those in the police or Crown who failed them remained in the shadows.
“For Margaret, only a public inquiry can reveal the corruption, the criminality and the motivation.
“Accountability, that is what the police and the Crown always fear, and they cannot be allowed to dictate the terms as they have done for over 18 years.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf takes aim at Anas Sarwar amid council tax row
Police Scotland has apologised to the family of Miss Caldwell and Iain Packer’s other victims, admitting they were “let down” by policing.
Constance added: “The outcome of this trial is the result of a thorough and complex reinvestigation of the case by Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, but it is absolutely right that Police Scotland has recognised and apologised for the failures of the original investigation.
“While I do think this means that many lessons have been learned by Police Scotland, at the time there is no doubt that women were failed.
“More widely, we need to eradicate the abhorrent violence against women and girls that is still prevalent, and all of our institutions need to continue to play a part in this journey.
“The only way we can fully protect women and girls and end violence is through fundamental societal change – a change in the actions and behaviour of those who perpetrate violence and abuse and to address and root out the causes of that violence, including toxic masculinity and gender inequality, that leads to violence, harassment, misogyny and abuse against women.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here