SCOTLAND has typically performed better on A&E wait targets than England and Wales over the past decade, a new report has found.
The analysis from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) makes comparisons for the first time between certain types of health data across the country.
All three nations have recorded a steady rise in recent years in the percentage of people not seen within four hours, including a steep jump since the Covid-19 pandemic.
Scotland typically recorded a lower proportion of people waiting more than four hours in A&E departments than England and Wales, it found.
READ MORE: NHS Scotland: A&E waiting times increasing under winter pressure
The proportion of people waiting more than four hours to be seen in A&E departments has typically been higher in Labour-run Wales than either England or Scotland over the past decade, the report shows.
Levels were higher in Wales than England and Scotland in every month from January 2013 to August 2022 and in most months since then, with England taking the top spot on only a few occasions.
Waiting times at Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments represent an area where comparisons can be made between England, Wales and Scotland, because the data is collected in broadly the same way, the ONS said.
The report shows that all three nations have seen a general upward trend in the proportion of A&E attendances waiting longer than four hours, with Wales rising from 15.6% in January 2013 to a peak of 45.8% in December 2022, before falling to 40.5% in September 2023.
England started at a lower point than Wales, at just 8.1% of A&E attendances in January 2013, but recorded a higher peak in December 2022 of 50.4%, before dropping to 42.4% in September 2023.
The figures for Scotland run from 11.7% in January 2013 to a peak of 41.7% in December 2022, with 33.5% for September 2023.
The ONS said the figures may reflect a number of factors, including the ease of access to A&E departments and the services offered, population differences such as age and levels of deprivation, and the mix of healthcare facilities available.
The data covers attendances at A&E departments providing 24-hour consultant-led services, which are equipped for the treatment of serious and life-threatening injuries.
These are called Type 1 Departments in England, Emergency Departments in Scotland and Major Emergency Departments in Wales.
Health services operating in the three nations all follow policy guidance that states every effort should be made to transfer or admit patients, who require a period of observation, assessment, or recovery, to suitable facilities where available – at which point the waiting time “clock” stops.
READ MORE: Long A&E waits disadvantage women, figures show
No such policy exists in Northern Ireland, which is why A&E waiting times cannot be directly compared with the rest of the UK.
Becky Tinsley, a deputy director at the ONS, said the report was intended to “make it easier to understand health data from across the UK” and help create “a joined-up statistical picture”.
She added: “This doesn’t mean that we’re developing a one-size-fits-all approach to data across the four nations.
“We understand that there are differences in policy, infrastructure and processes which may impact data collection and our ability to make comparisons.
“There are also other factors that are important to consider, like differences in the age of each of the countries’ populations, which impact people’s health and result in different demands on the health service.
“By considering this wider context, we can better understand the differences and similarities in statistical outputs across the nations, and the areas they describe.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel