SINCE the death of Queen Elizabeth and King Charles’ ascent to the throne, attitudes towards the British royal family have dramatically changed right across the world.
At the turn of the year, polling in the UK showed for the first time support for the monarchy had dipped below 50%.
In the past few years, we’ve also seen Barbados become a republic while several other Caribbean nations have said they intend to hold referendums on ditching the monarchy in the near future.
Queen Elizabeth was someone many Australians held dear, with even republicans describing her as a “respected public figure”.
But former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull once said Australians are Elizabethans, not monarchists.
As King Charles prepares to make his first trip Down Under as monarch later this year, The National asked Isaac Jeffrey, national director of the Australian Republic Movement (ARM), where the nation is now on the royals and how close he thinks a referendum is on becoming a republic.
Support for monarchy fizzling away
Last time Australia held a vote on becoming a republic in 1999 it failed with 54% voting against the idea, but last year the country’s High Commissioner Stephen Smith said it was “inevitable” it would now happen.
READ MORE: Major campaign seeks to expose royal family 'secrets'
Recent polling by Australian papers The Daily Telegraph and The Mercury put support for a republic at 52% and 60% respectively, but internal polling by the ARM suggests as little as 8% of Australians now back the royal family staying in place.
Jeffrey told The National: “People are telling us they want a say in who leads and represents them. They also wants accountability and transparency from officeholders.”
“Queen Elizabeth was a respected public figure and the only head of state a lot of Aussies had for their whole lives.
“Following her passing, Australia has started the conversation about the role of head of state.
“It's no reflection on the royal family or the British people, we'll always be friends and allies. It's about having a democratically elected and accountable Aussie we're proud of representing us on the world stage and working full-time and fully committed solely to Australia.”
‘Irrelevant rich celebrities on other side of world’
When asked how Australians feel about King Charles, Jeffrey said it was difficult to see how he could ever resonate with people and most don’t care about him or his heirs at all despite the press continuing to cover regular updates on their movements.
He detailed how, just like in the UK, people are struggling increasingly to relate to the monarchy amid widespread financial difficulties.
READ MORE: 'The year of Charles' no clothes': A look back on the King's 2023
He said: “We’re in the midst of a cost of living crisis. People are struggling to pay their bills and meet their mortgage payments and I’m not sure the vast majority of Australians could imagine being born into outrageous wealth, power and privilege.
“A multibillion dollar property portfolio and 500 personal staff are so far removed from the Aussie notion of having a go and working hard to get ahead, so it’s hard to see how that life experience can truly resonate.
“I think some Aussies enjoy the show, much like they enjoy Neighbours, but the majority just don’t care what they are doing. They are irrelevant rich celebrities on the other side of the world and that’s why we’re so open to becoming a republic.”
When will a referendum happen?
Public opinion certainly seems to suggest Australia is only heading in one direction, but how soon a referendum will happen is complicated to predict.
In October, a referendum was held to amend the constitution to recognise Indigenous Australians and create a body for them to advise government, but the idea was overwhelmingly rejected.
The referendum, dubbed "The Voice", was Australia's first in almost a quarter of a century. With the majority of ballots counted, the No vote led Yes 60% to 40%.
Jeffrey said that referendum had been “very divisive” and believes the country may now be going through “referendum fatigue”.
That said, he said he could still see a vote on a republic happening in the next few years.
READ MORE: 'We are seeing some very low and petty blows from Westminster'
He said: “There is significant support for a republic. Only 8% of the country are rusted on supporters of the monarchy.
“We've just had a very divisive referendum last year, so there is some referendum fatigue, but I think it is possible we could see a vote within the next term of Parliament possibly around 2027.
“The important thing is that we have the conversation with the Australian people and get their active involvement in shaping our next chapter. So we'll take the time to get it right.”
What would Australia look like as a republic?
Jeffrey said removing the King as the head of state would have “practical and symbolic importance” in Australia but would not represent a “wholesale overhaul of government”.
After the Australia Act of 1986, the country severed almost all ties to the UK system apart from the monarch as head of state but, while there is a clear desire to remove that final link, Jeffrey claimed Australians are not seeking a US-style executive president.
Jeffrey said: “They'd prefer a style similar to the Irish system.
“The head of state would be largely ceremonial with some limited powers to ensure the smooth operation of Parliament and government.
“We'll still have the Westminster system and a Prime Minister as head of government who handles the day-to-day administration and law making, [but] we'd [also] have an Aussie acting in our best interests and representing us as an equal on the world stage.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel