SCOTLAND is hosting more displaced people than England per capita despite the Home Secretary’s claims that it must do more, an expert has said.
Dr Peter Walsh, a lecturer in migration at the University of Oxford’s Migration Observatory, said that Scotland is home to 50% more displaced people than England per capita.
It comes after James Cleverly, the Home Secretary, said in a letter to First Minister Humza Yousaf that Scotland had taken proportionately half the number of asylum seekers given accommodation in England.
The Tory minister asked that efforts were made to “rapidly” increase asylum accommodation north of the Border, suggesting the use of a cruise ship off Edinburgh.
Cleverly wrote that Scotland currently houses eight asylum seekers for every 10,000 people – less than the nine in Wales, and half the 16 in England. He urged Yousaf to “continue to work together to help address the challenges we collectively face”.
However, Walsh told BBC Scotland that while Cleverly’s figures were correct, he was taking a narrow view that did not give the whole picture.
The Oxford University expert said: “It's helpful, I think, to take a broader view.
“The Home Secretary criticises the Scottish Government for not taking enough asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are those who reach the UK under their own steam, sometimes arriving without authorisation, such as by small boat, and then they claim asylum on British shores.
“So, this excludes Afghans. It excludes Ukrainians. If we limit our analysis just to asylum seekers, it is true that Scotland hosts about half the number per capita than England does.
READ MORE: Union 'not safe’ with 2014 independence support a ‘floor not ceiling’
“However, we also know that Scotland hosts a lot of Ukrainians: 26,000 compared with 100,000 in England. But England has 10 times the population. So per capita, Scotland hosts about 2.5 times more Ukrainians per capita than England.
“If we look overall at all the categories of displaced people that are hosted – that's Ukrainians, Afghans, and asylum seekers – what we find is quite interesting. England hosts four people per 1000 of its resident population and Scotland six.
“So, per capita overall, Scotland hosts 50% more than England.”
Marsh explained that many asylum seekers arrive on small boats over the Channel with the goal of living in London. The Tory government then “disperses” them around the UK, and it is these arrivals that Cleverly is asking for Scotland to take more of.
The expert said: “There's a particular emphasis in the letter on what the Home Secretary refers to as large sites, so this would be akin to the Bibby Stockholm barge.
“We also have dedicated asylum accommodation facilities in England, typically disused military facilities … The challenge there is that these always encounter difficulties.
“In fact, our largest asylum accommodation site, Napier Barracks, an adapted military facility, was at some point closed down because a UK judge said it was unlawful to house people there because of the poor conditions.
“So these large sites are difficult to manage and some government estimates actually suggest they're more expensive than housing people in hotels.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The Home Office is responsible for provision of asylum accommodation, including hotels procured as contingency initial asylum accommodation.
“Ministers have been clear that the UK Government needs to respect the important role of local authorities in asylum dispersal and should provide more financial support for them as it presses ahead with plans to close asylum hotels.
READ MORE: ‘We were like slaves’: Home Office ‘turning blind eye’ to exploitation in Scots farms
“Scotland has consistently played its part in supporting asylum dispersal since it was introduced over two decades ago. We are committed to supporting people to integrate into our communities and to providing the safety and security they need as they begin to rebuild their lives.
“Scotland is offering sanctuary to more than double the displaced Ukrainians per head of population than any other part of the UK, with more than 39,000 people with a Scottish sponsor being granted a visa, and more than 26,000 of those having arrived in the UK via a Scottish sponsor, with over 20,000 as a direct result of the Scottish Government acting as a super sponsor.
“As we did with the Syrian and Ukrainian Resettlement programmes, which saw all 32 local authorities in Scotland participate and welcome displaced people into their communities, Scotland stands ready to offer refuge and sanctuary for those who are displaced.
“From the outset of the conflict in Gaza, the Scottish Government has called on the UK Government to use its existing UK Resettlement Scheme, and ensure it is aligned with UNHCR to provide those who want to leave with the support they require.
“We have received the Home Secretary’s letter and will respond in due course.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel