AN SNP councillor has quit the party over its “incoherent independence strategy”.
Karl Rosie has served as an SNP member of the Highland Council since 2017 but said he was “increasingly disillusioned” with how the party was approaching the constitutional question.
He said: “I have pondered this decision for some time and it has not been an easy process.”
The SNP adopted a new approach to independence last year, which has drawn criticism from some Yes campaigners.
At the party’s annual conference last year, SNP leader Humza Yousaf announced the party would begin independence negotiations with the UK Government if it won the most seats at the next General Election.
The Scottish Government would simultaneously ask for permission for a second referendum. If Westminster denied requests for negotiations on independence and a second referendum, the SNP would then consider treating the next Scottish Parliament election as a de facto referendum.
Rosie said: “As a staunch supporter of independence for Scotland, I find myself increasingly disillusioned with the incoherent independence strategy that the party has adopted.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes slams Labour's 'metropolitan arrogance' toward Highland Scotland
“It has become apparent to me that we cannot continue to make promises of independence to the electorate when I believe it is no longer a priority for the party, and I can no longer stand by such inconsistencies.”
Joining voices such as Fergus Ewing and Kate Forbes, he criticised Scottish Government policies such as shelved plans to create a deposit return recycling scheme and highly protected marine areas (HMPAs).
He said: “I am deeply troubled by the SNP's policies, which often seem disproportionately focused on the Central Belt, neglecting the needs and priorities of regions like ours in the Highlands.
“Issues such as the highly protected marine areas, the deposit return scheme, the lack of progress on A9 duelling and upgrades, along with missed opportunities to develop a meaningful industrial strategy highlight the disconnect between the party's agenda and the realities faced by our constituents.
“It is imperative that our policies reflect the diverse needs of all Scots, regardless of their geographical location.”
And Rosie said that others within the party had “struggled” with the party’s direction.
“I acknowledge a number of my fellow branch members and those who campaigned alongside me over the years, not just on my campaigns but also on other political campaigns for other SNP candidates, will be disappointed with this choice I’ve made,” he said.
“I want to thank them for their friendship and support, and I can assure them I do not do this lightly.
“I wish them the very best going forward, especially as I know that others have struggled with the direction of the SNP, as I have. For me, it is imperative to put people before party.”
Maree Todd, the SNP MSP for Caithness, Sutherland and Ross, said: "After years of positive and successful working together as part of the SNP Highland team, it is regretful to see Karl take this decision.
"I wish Karl well on a personal level and hope that we can continue to work together in the best interests of people across the Highlands.
"The SNP will continue to focus on getting the best solution not just for the Highlands, but all of Scotland, and that is through independence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel