CHEMISTS have trialled a new technique that takes a “chemical fingerprint” of gin in seconds, which could help producers futureproof their gins and conduct quality control.
A team of researchers from Heriot-Watt University worked alongside the University of Edinburgh on the project, and say their findings could help alcohol regulators detect fraudulent products.
The Heriot-Watt team consists of Dr Ruaraidh McIntosh and Dr Dave Ellis and PhD student Kacper Krakowiak. The trio worked alongside Professor Dusan Uhrin from the University of Edinburgh on the project.
The researchers used nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to exam the gin samples.
READ MORE: Scottish scientists turn whisky byproduct into sustainable fuel
The technique is more commonly associated with finding the structural determination of molecules.
Dr McIntosh said: “Gin production has exploded in Scotland and the UK over the past 20 years, but compared to Scotch whisky it’s very loosely defined and regulated, and not well researched.
“Producers need to know more so that they can ensure they have years of sustainable, flavoursome gin ahead of them.
“And consumers and importers need to know that gin is genuine and the quality they’re expecting.”
Dr Ellis said the whisky market is “well regulated”, but says there is no equivalent for gin.
He said the EU imposes some bare requirements, but “essentially you can make anything, call it a gin and nobody will give you any trouble. It’s a bit like the Wild West.”
He added: “Colleagues at the Heriot-Watt International Centre for Brewing and Distilling have created a database of botanicals and this could be used as a basis of standardisation in the future, but we shouldn’t discourage innovation in gin production.
“We just need to try and find a way of reassuring consumers that the ‘gin’ that they are drinking really is gin.”
READ MORE: Scottish scientists could eliminate animal testing with invention
He added: “At the moment, most gin analysis is carried out using mass spectrometry. It’s effective and highly sensitive but does not provide a complete picture of the composition in a single experiment in the way that NMR can.
“NMR basically fingerprints the gin’s chemical compounds. It does this by detecting the signals given by the hydrogen atoms in each compound. These act as markers and enable identification.”
“In under five minutes, we end up with an overlay of all these fingerprints, providing a snapshot of the compounds present.”
The team put 16 different gins to the test, some they bought from the supermarket and some samples were provided by colleagues at Heriot-Watt’s International Centre for Brewing and Distilling (ICBD).
Dr Ellis said: “We determined which compounds were present in each gin, and in which quantities.
“NMR can distinguish between different structural forms of individual molecules, and there are many of these cases in gin.
“For example, the flavour compounds pinene and limonene have the same atomic makeup but have different structures and, critically, flavours.”
He added: “We tested some fruit gins and gin liqueurs. The NMR identified the different varieties of sugar present in the gin, which are introduced through flavour additives, and their quantity. This is important information for consumers.
“UK distillers rely on imported juniper berries for their gin, and climate change could affect their quality and availability.
“If their traditional supply dries up, will sourcing juniper berries from elsewhere change the flavour? That’s what we could determine with this technique. NMR has huge potential for the gin industry.”
The researchers are expanding their studies to embrace many more types of so-called gin and other alcoholic beverages.
The findings are reported in the Journal of Brewing and Distilling.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here