THE Tories have been accused of using migrants as “scapegoats” for the UK housing emergency, with “deeply worrying language” suggesting housing will go to “British people” who work hard.
In a post on social media, the Conservative party official account posted a graphic with the words “British homes for British people”.
Another slogan stated: "We’re ensuring decent hard working people are prioritised for the home they need."
The caption read: “We are making sure the allocation of social housing is fairer for people and cracking down on rule breakers”.
The post came after reports in late January that Downing Street is considering a “British homes for British workers” scheme to give UK families higher priority for social housing.
We are making sure the allocation of social housing is fairer for people and cracking down on rule breakers. pic.twitter.com/pfTgT8bUK5
— Conservatives (@Conservatives) January 30, 2024
According to The Guardian, officials are preparing to launch a consultation within weeks into how British citizens can be given faster access to social housing.
The post caused outrage across with Twitter/X users, including a post from Shelter, the UK’s leading housing charity.
It called out the post's “deeply worrying language” as a way to blame migrants “for failings in society” and hide genuine government failure.
The organisation said: “This is deeply worrying language, that has historically been used to blame migrants for failings in society and to divide people and communities.
“It's a smokescreen designed to cover up the government’s own failure to tackle the housing emergency. #SocialHousingNotScapegoating.”
It added: “As the #GeneralElection approaches, we expect to hear more and more calls stigmatising people who weren't born here.
“This shouldn't be normalised in our politics – let's support everyone who is hit hardest by the housing emergency and push for real solutions.”
Another user wrote: “We see you Tories very well now and know your old tricks”, with others suggesting the party avoid building houses.
One wrote: “Maybe, just work to make regular housing affordable and crackdown on parasitic landlords and buy to let schemes? Just a thought lads.”
No 10 and the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities both previously declined to comment on what they called “policy speculation”.
The Prime Minister is striving to be seen as tough on immigration after net legal levels hit record highs under the Tories and he struggles to get his Rwanda policy for illegal crossings accepted.
READ MORE: Sky News: Tory MP Andrea Leadsom slammed for 'shameless' Brexit defence
Amid dire polling for the Conservatives, Rishi Sunak is wary of losing votes to the right-wing Reform UK party as well as to Labour.
Polly Neate, the chief executive of the Shelter housing charity, described the proposal as “divisive and depressing” and “nothing more than scapegoating at its worst”.
“It is unnecessary, unenforceable and unjust,” she said.
“Not only does it ignore the fact that there are already stringent rules so only UK citizens or those with settled status can access homes for social rent, but it blames a group of people for a housing emergency that they did not create.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel