KEIR Starmer has been criticised for wearing a progress Pride badge despite backtracking on self-identification for transgender people.
During an LGBT+ History Month reception for Labour MPs and Lords in Westminster, Starmer was photographed sporting the badge.
Unlike the typical rainbow Pride flag, the progress Pride flag contains an additional chevron which features colours representative of transgender people, people of colour, and those living or lost to HIV/AIDS.
However, many have questioned Starmer’s commitment to transgender rights after the Labour Party abandoned its previous commitment to self-identification for transgender people.
Self-identification was included in the Scottish Government’s blocked Gender Recognition Reform Bill.
Tonight was the LGBT+ History Month reception for Labour Members of Parliament & the House of Lords held in partnership with Emerald Life.
— LGBT+ History Month 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ (@LGBTHM) January 29, 2024
CEO of @SchoolsOUTUK Professor Emeritus @suesanders03 was delighted to attend & talk about this year's theme.#UnderTheScope #LGBTplusHM pic.twitter.com/izXwJBEiAq
It would have allowed transgender people in Scotland to legally change their gender on official documentation without a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
In 2022 Starmer declared his support for including self-identification in the reform of the UK’s Gender Recognition Act.
But by July 2023 shadow secretary for women and equalities, Anneliese Dodds, criticised the Scottish Government’s gender reform legislation, claiming it was “more about picking a fight with Westminster than bringing meaningful change”.
She added: “We will not make the same mistakes.
“The requirement to obtain a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria remains an important part of accessing a gender recognition certificate.”
READ MORE: Angela Rayner panned for response to Gaza 'genocide' question
Many on social media expressed their distaste for Starmer wearing the badge despite U-turning on self-identification.
Green Party councillor Alex Catt said: “Are you joking @Keir_Starmer???
“You’ve abandoned trans peoples right to self-ID, backed a review into the Equality Act to exclude trans people and backed education guidance telling teachers to out kids to their parents.”
Another user added: “Given the Labour Party’s position on trans people, this is pretty disgraceful. You should be embarrassed.”
The LGBT+ History Month account has since closed comments on the post after receiving criticism for the post.
A spokesperson for LGBT+ History Month said: "Last night we were invited to attend an annual LGBT+ History event held by the Labour Party, this was not an event held or organised by ourselves.
"Our CEO attended Professor Emeritus Sue Sanders and used the opportunity to talk to attendees about the LGBT+ History Month theme Medicine #UnderTheScope and the importance
of inclusive education."
It comes after shadow health secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News that Labour would ban all trans patients from single-sex hospital wards.
Instead, he suggested that they should be placed in separate wards solely for trans people.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here