THE Home Office has been accused of presiding over a major “child protection issue” after it was revealed more than 1300 children were wrongly judged to be adults by border officials.
New figures show that in the last 18 months, 1300 children were wrongly assessed to be adults by the Home Office, ITV News reports.
The broadcaster said that from January to June 2023, 69 local authorities received 1004 referrals to their children’s services departments for young people who had been sent to adult accommodation or detention.
Of the cases where decisions were made, 57% were found to be children – meaning that in just six months at least 485 children had been wrongly placed in adult accommodation or detention.
A teenage asylum seeker tells ITV News what happened when they arrived in Dover.
— ITV News Politics (@ITVNewsPolitics) January 22, 2024
“They checked the hairs on my face and they said 'no you are not looking like 17', they said 'you are looking like 26 or something'. I said 'no'."https://t.co/4lrNxhww4R pic.twitter.com/urdVfPFAO3
ITV News said it had spoken with four young people who had wrongly been judged to be adults, with some claiming that border officials refused to believe the dates of birth shown on ID documents from countries such as Afghanistan.
While in adult detention, teenagers share rooms with older men with no access to education or support from the local authority.
READ MORE: GB News presenter says asylum seekers should be forced into unpaid work
One teenager, who ITV gave the pseudonym Akhmadzia, said he had fled Afghanistan after the Taliban had regained control following the exit of US and UK forces in 2021.
He said: “I told them: 'I have my ID and I can get it from my country' but they didn’t believe me and they just wrote down my age.'”
The Refugee Council has called the revelations a “scandal” and has accused the Home Office of creating a child protection issue.
Chief executive Enver Solomon told ITV News: "I think it’s incredibly shocking and actually I would say it is a hidden scandal.
"The fact that traumatised children who have come here alone as refugees, are being told they are adults when they are actually children and what’s worse is they are being placed in accommodation with adults.
"They are experiencing harassment, abuse, that has to be a child protection issue."
The boys who spoke to ITV said they had their ages guessed by border officials following brief visual assessments.
A spokesperson for the organisation added: “It’s not acceptable that we’re having flawed age assessments as it has devastating consequences for the young person.
“The Government needs to take urgent steps to correct the failures that are taking place at the moment.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “Age assessments can be challenging and there is no single method which can determine a person’s age with precision.
"Many individuals arriving in the UK who claim to be children often don’t have clear evidence like an original passport or identity document to back this up.
“We are strengthening our age assessment process, including establishing the National Age Assessment Board and specifying scientific methods of age assessments.
“Measures under the Illegal Migration Act will ensure the swift removal of individuals who have been assessed as adults and who have no right to remain in the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here