A DEVELOPER has vowed to withdraw the plan for a new Scottish homeless hostel after resounding outrage from the local community.
A proposal was submitted to the council to turn the empty Broomfield Court care home, in Glasgow, into short-stay accommodation.
However, the bid was quickly met with backlash from residents, who started a petition to try and block the development.
Now, the director of applicant W100 Ltd has said he will withdraw the plan after an intense meeting with locals on Tuesday night, The Glasgow Times reports.
Waheed Malik, director of the company, said to the crowd of over 150 people: "We will suspend our activities immediately. We will just withdraw the plans.
"We need to take on board every single person's opinion here.
"I need to see how can we change the plans and go back to the drawing board.
"But I am not going to walk away."
The gathering was organised to allow people to voice their disapproval of the proposal and to discuss issues.
Homeowners claimed that not all of them received letters notifying them of the plan despite it being handed in to the council in November.
Some also alleged that they were purposely misled.
One attendee said: "We were told this would be a regeneration. That it's for the community.
"They should instead build one-bedroom houses."
Another added: "I live near this building and I never got a letter explaining what is happening, neither did my neighbours.
"Only around 30 houses were notified."
Malik denied accusations of misleading people and claimed he did not know who received letters.
He also clarified that the hostel would be used to house rough sleepers.
In response, locals raised fears for safety and emphasised the lack of resources in the area.
Councillor Audrey Dempsey, who chaired and organised the meeting, said: "There is a children’s house on the doorstep of the venue with vulnerable kids, a nursery school and a primary school across the road.
"There is soon to be a prison across the road.
"The residents have really high concerns about anti-social behaviour as this is a reputation that seems to follow hostels that house homeless people."
Malik replied: "This would be a place to help the most vulnerable, not for drug addicts and violent people.
"We would have trained staff and case workers permanently there, seven days a week.
"We would also screen people before they get here and would do regular checks."
He further assured the group that his other business, Alba Hostel Glasgow in the West End, is a safe place and comes highly recommended by online sites such as TripAdvisor.
The politician also stated Barmulloch hasn't had any investment in years and they simply have no means to share.
A resident agreed: "There is too much poverty here already.
"We don't even have a GP or money for social workers at the school."
Another replied: "We need a play park. 13 years ago we were promised a swing park.
"We still don't have it."
Malik said he "would be willing to" build a play park in the grass pitch near the development.
In defence of the proposal, he added: "We are trying to do something here that has never been done before in the city.
"We would work in partnership with the council.
"Nobody who comes here would be paying out of their own pocket."
After agreeing to take a step back from the current plan, he suggested that a committee should be put together, containing him, local politicians and members of the residents' association, to figure out the next steps of the development.
In the planning documents, a "the rising demand for short-stay accommodation in the area" was cited at the reason for the bid, which Malik said has been exaggerated by the housing crisis.
Originally, the building was used as a care home until its closure in 2022.
At the time of printing, the application for the 74-bedroom facility was still live.
A Glasgow City Council official who attended the assembly, said: "The council cannot suspend the process, it needs to be the applicant."
He also encouraged attendees to leave a comment on the online planning portal.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here