A FORMER Tory cabinet minister has said Rishi Sunak’s plans to maximise North Sea oil and gas production give the impression he is “not being serious” about tackling climate change.
Tory MP Alok Sharma, who was president of the international Cop26 climate summit hosted by the UK, said he will not support the Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill when MPs vote on it later.
He said the legislation is a “smoke and mirrors” exercise which reinforces the perception that the UK is “rowing back from climate action”.
The bill will require the industry regulator to run annual rounds for new oil and gas licences, subject to stringent new emissions and imports tests.
Currently licensing rounds are run when the North Sea Transition Authority (NTSA) decides it is necessary.
The Government claims the introduction of regular licensing for exploration will increase certainty, investor confidence and make the UK more energy-independent.
READ MORE: New North Sea oil licences 'make no real difference' to energy costs
But the legislation has already triggered the resignation of former net zero tsar Chris Skidmore as a Tory MP.
Sharma said the legislation is a “total distraction” and “a smoke and mirrors bill which frankly changes nothing” except to further damage the UK’s international reputation on climate action.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “What this bill does do is reinforce that unfortunate perception about the UK rowing back from climate action – we saw this last autumn with the chopping and changing of some policies – and actually not being serious about meeting our international commitments.”
He said that, at the Cop28 summit in December, the UK signed up to a global plan to transition away from fossil fuels but “this bill is about doubling down on granting more oil and gas production licences”.
“It’s actually the opposite of what we agreed to do internationally, so I won’t be supporting it.”
Sharma said the Climate Change Committee has been “pretty clear that continued expansion of new oil and gas reserves is inconsistent with our climate commitments”.
A group of 30 politicians, including Skidmore and Lord Goldsmith, have also written to Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho urging her and the Government to drop the bill, saying that it is “diametrically opposed” to the global consensus of moving away from fossil fuels.
They said it will not achieve the Government’s aim of improving energy security as it cannot control the intentions of private companies who wish to sell the oil abroad.
READ MORE: Petition to strip Prince Andrew of Scottish title passes milestone
Further North Sea oil and gas development would only damage the UK’s reputation on climate change, harm marine wildlife and enrich fossil fuel companies, the group said.
Instead, the UK Government should increase the supply of renewables and energy efficiency measures, it added.
The legislation, coupled with Sunak’s decision to delay transitioning away from petrol and diesel cars and gas-fired boilers – which he said would save consumers money – has caused unease among Tory environmentalists.
Skidmore, who led a Government review of net zero, announced on Friday that he would stand down as he said the Prime Minister’s environmental stance is “wrong and will cause future harm”.
The Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill will have its first Commons test on Monday night.
Downing Street declined to say whether the aim of the Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill is to increase the number of licences granted.
“I’m not going to speculate on whether more licences will be granted, that’s a decision partly for the companies themselves,” Sunak’s spokesman told journalists.
Challenged over the fact the oil will be sold abroad rather than reserved for the domestic market, the official argued it is “preferable to have an international market which has more oil and gas from the UK and other countries which are stable, which are not authoritarian regimes”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel