THE BBC has admitted its new “documentary” about King Charles avoids addressing the difficult headlines which have plagued the royal family this year.
Charles III: The Coronation Year aired on BBC One on Boxing Day and looks back on the preparations for his crowning.
But it avoids tackling the news stories that have rocked the royals over the last year, including controversies around Prince Harry and Prince Andrew, accusations of racism or protesters arrested during the Coronation.
A BBC news story about the documentary described it as being “a warm and sympathetic account of the new reign” which lacked “glimpses of any difficult headlines from the year”.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland corrects more errors than all other BBC UK branches combined
Graham Smith, the chief executive of the anti-monarchy campaign group Republic, live tweeted a review of the “documentary” calling it an “attempt by the BBC to shamelessly promote the Royals”.
He added: “It's a farce. A PR piece, engineered to promote the undemocratic values of the monarchy.”
The palace has previously been accused of attempting to exert “draconian” restrictions on journalists seeking to interview members of the royal family.
In 2015, The Guardian reported that Channel 4 News turned down an interview with Charles, then Prince of Wales, because the palace asked to vet all questions and to edit the end product.
A major poll from earlier this year showed support for ending the monarchy to be at the all time high of 28%.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel