LABOUR are reportedly considering plans to have asylum claims processed abroad as an alternative to the Tories’ Rwanda plan.
Party officials and shadow ministers are drawing up plans to deter migrants from crossing the Channel in an effort to neutralise Conservative attack lines on immigration, The Times reports.
Their plans could see asylum seekers have their claims assessed abroad before arriving in the UK, through deals with other countries.
Labour are reportedly also consulting with immigration and asylum experts and is in talks with other European countries considering similar schemes.
Austria, Germany, Italy and Denmark are exploring ways to process asylum claims outside of the EU.
Labour’s shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper (below) and shadow immigration minister Stephen Kinnock are in talks with David Blunkett, the former home secretary under Tony Blair.
READ MORE: Home Office struggles to source aeroplanes for Rwanda immigration plan
In 2004, it was revealed Blunkett was in talks with the government of Tanzania to house failed Somali asylum seekers in a camp in exchange for aid payments to the country.
The plans never materialised but were defended in the Commons by Blair, who said: “I honestly cannot understand the objection to seeing whether it is possible, if people are going to make asylum claims and begin their asylum journey close to the country of origin, to try to process some of those claims there.”
He added that the proposed policy would be insufficient to tackle the “bulk of the asylum problem”.
The Times reported that Labour leader Keir Starmer’s “red line” for any policy would be schemes which automatically blocked an individual being granted asylum in the UK. British officials would also have to be in charge of processing the claims under the Labour plans.
Blunkett (below) told the paper it was important British officials were in charge of processing claims.
He said: “What’s absolutely crucial is who is doing the processing and that they’re allowed back into the country. Without it, you’re merely transferring the problem on to somebody else.
“But if British officials are doing the processing, then you’ve got a scheme that fits with the conventions.”
Alison Thewliss, the SNP's home affairs spokesperson, said: "Yet again, Keir Starmer's Labour Party is dancing to the Tory tune, this time on Rwanda and asylum.
"Sir Keir is so weak he has been forced to back Brexit, Tory spending cuts, NHS privatisation – and he is now caught in a trap over the absurd Rwanda plan, which has cost Scottish taxpayers millions of pounds.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel