AN economic think tank that "incubated" Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng as junior MPs has been found to have appeared on UK media an average of 14 times a day in the last year.
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), an influential think tank based in Paris, has increased its public appearances by almost 50% since 2019, according to investigative journalist Peter Geoghegan.
The institute’s latest annual accounts, released earlier this week, show that it had 5265 media hits in the past year, 43% higher than its previous peak in 2019.
The accounts also detail the number of former IEA staff now working in the UK media.
READ MORE: UK Government U-turns on plans to increase visa earning threshold
They state: “The team saw the departure of Emily Carver to GB News and Annabel Denham to the Telegraph, joining our growing pool of alumni with promising careers in British media."
READ MORE: What is the Institute of Economic Affairs and what's its connection to Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng?
SNP MP Alyn Smith (below) has written to Tim Davie, director-general of the BBC, and the head of Ofcom, Melanie Dawes, requesting reassurance that they “view the relevant guidelines as fit for purpose” to ensure any agenda of dark money think tanks “are apparent to the viewer or listener.”
Smith wrote: "As you will be aware, one such institution – the Institute of Economic Affairs – reported on their latest accounts that that they had 5265 media hits last year, an increase of 43% from the year before.
"I should state I appreciate your position in supporting free speech, fair comment and informed debate. I have no difficulty with any person or organisation setting up to advocate for the interests of private funders. In the absence of German-style public funding, it is perhaps inevitable that many think tanks depend heavily on donors, and I can see the argument that many wish to retain their anonymity.
"Some of it is I daresay quite innocent. That being said, surely such organisations being platformed by broadcasters, and the BBC in particular, should be fully transparent about who is paying them and who they represent."
READ MORE: New Levelling Up funding sees Scottish Government snubbed again
The Guardian previously reported that the IEA has taken donations from the fossil fuel industry while OpenDemocracy revealed it also took cash from the tobacco industry.
The IEA's website reads: "The Institute is entirely independent of any political party or group, and is entirely funded by voluntary donations from individuals, companies and foundations who want to support its work."
In 2018, Unearthed reported that the IEA offered to broker access to UK ministers for US donors seeking to influence Brexit.
In 2019, the Charity Commission warned the organisation about using its resources to campaign for a hard Brexit. The warning was later withdrawn after the IEA agreed to work with the commission to improve its conduct following “a breach of charity law”.
And in 2021, it lost a two-year court battle with LBC radio host James O'Brien who claimed the IEA is a politically motivated lobbying firm funded by "dark money".
Following Kwasi Kwarteng's tax-cutting mini-budget in 2022, Conservative Home founder Tim Montgomerie tweeted: "A massive moment for [the Institute of Economic Affairs].
"They’ve been advocating these policies for years. They incubated Truss and Kwarteng during their early years as MPs. Britain is now their laboratory."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel