MONEY saved by scrapping a high-speed rail link to Manchester will be spent on repairing roads in London – sparking disbelief from MPs in the north of England.
The Department for Transport announced on Wednesday that £235 million has been pledged to every London borough with money recouped after HS2’s northern leg was scrapped – as part of its “Network North” project.
Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham said: "'Network North' seems to include everywhere - except the north."
The money will be split between each of London’s 32 boroughs and Transport for London over 11 years – with £75m committed for next year.
Andrew Gwynne, a Labour MP for Manchester, said the Government was “extracting the urine”.
He said: “Whilst I have no doubt London's roads (like everywhere else's) need investment after 13 years of Tory cuts, let's remember this was Crewe-Manchester's rail funding.
"To badge this as a 'Network North' project is extracting the urine in a big way. Cheers Rishi!"
READ MORE: Scotland has 'little hope' of seeing HS2 benefits in 'unequal Union', Alba MP says
Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner added: “Are they for real?”
The Government has redirected £8.3 billion saved through the decision to scrap HS2 to improving roads throughout England.
Rishi Sunak announced the project would be scrapped at the Conservative Party conference in Manchester earlier this year.
He claimed at the time that “every single penny” of the £36bn saved would be spent on “hundreds of new transport projects in the north and the Midlands, and across the country".
Transport Secretary, Mark Harper, said: “This government is on the side of drivers and is investing £235m to improve and repair London’s roads, part of the biggest-ever funding uplift for local road improvements.
“This funding is part of a long-term, 11-year plan to ensure road users across London have smoother, faster and safer journeys by using redirected HS2 funding to make the right long-term decisions for a brighter future.”
London has some of the lowest rates of car ownership in the UK, in part because of its extensive public transport system.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel