SHONA Robison confirmed any further legal challenge to recent rulings on the controversial gender recognition reform will be scrapped, but pledged to “robustly defend” the Scottish Parliament.
Speaking to BBC Scotland’s The Nine, the Deputy First Minister said the move to drop any further appeals was a “difficult decision” and that the Scottish Government had looked “very carefully” at the outcome.
It comes after the Court of Session dismissed an appeal against Westminster’s decision to override MSPs and axe the Gender Recognition Reform bill last week.
Robison told the BBC the UK Government’s evocation of a Section 35 order to overturn the bill and prevent it from becoming law was “outrageous”.
The legislation had attempted to simplify the process for transgender people to obtain a gender recognition certificate (GRC) and officially change their legally-recognised sex.
READ MORE: Ash Regan: Some constituents oppose my defection to Alba
But the UK Government ruled it could have an adverse impact on equalities legislation across the UK.
“We took all of the factors in the round, around what the case and what the prospects of the case would be, as well as all the other considerations and the impact indeed on the trans community.
“So, we’ve made that decision for all of the reasons that we have set out,” Ms Robison said.
She added: “The point here is that Scotland’s democratic institution overwhelmingly supported a piece of legislation that is within devolved competence.
“And because the UK Government and the Secretary of State for Scotland didn’t like it, he thought he could ride roughshod over the democratic wishes of this Parliament.”
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Alister Jack's gender reform block was no attack on devolution
The Deputy First Minister said the Scottish Government was concerned about a “pattern of behaviour” and said that any future attempts to block legislation would “not be tolerated”.
She added: “If we see this again, on a piece of legislation the Secretary of State for Scotland happens not to like, we will continue to robustly defend the wishes of this Parliament.
“(We will) make sure that we get the support of civic Scotland and other institutions in Scotland, to make sure that we send a loud message that this pattern of behaviour will not be tolerated.
“And we want to make sure if there is a change of government at UK level that we get a different understanding and a different relationship that is based on respect.”
Alba Party MSP Ash Regan (above), who left the Scottish Government and the SNP over her stance on GRR, said she welcomed the decision.
She told The Nine: “I think it’s welcome, I’m disappointed that unfortunately the Scottish Government has got itself into this mess to begin with, it didn’t have to do that.
“But what I will say, whilst this legislation, which is deeply unpopular with the Scottish public, is blocked for now, what I would like to see is that this legislation is withdrawn and I would like to see the Scottish Government say they will never implement this bill.”
The debate around gender reform in Scotland has been controversial with opponents claiming it could endanger the safety and rights of women and girls, while its supporters – including the Scottish Government – said it was a minor clerical change that would affect a small number of trans people in Scotland.
In statements given to the BBC, the Scottish Trans Alliance called the current system for gender recognition “intrusive, stressful and difficult” and said the bill that passed last year would have improved the lives of trans men and women.
For Women Scotland, who have campaigned against changes in the law, urged the Scottish Government to draw a line under the issue.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel