THE Home Office said it has “robust plans” for flights to Rwanda, following reports that airlines have so far refused to sign contracts to take part in the scheme.
Firms have so far declined to sign up to the flagship asylum policy, over fears of damage to their reputations from taking part in the plan, the Sunday Times has reported.
According to the newspaper, Tory ministers have since appointed an agent to source a commercial aircraft supplier willing to ferry migrants to the African nation if and when the scheme becomes operational.
A failure to do so raises the prospect of the Ministry of Defence and the RAF being brought in.
Home Official officials insist that if and when the Rwanda legislation becomes law, there will be flights available.
READ MORE: Operation Branchform: SNP investigation costs 'now over £1 million'
A UK Government spokesperson said: “The Government is committed to doing whatever it takes to stop the boats and get flights to Rwanda off the ground as soon as possible.
“Rwanda is ready to welcome large numbers of people and we have robust plans in place for future flights following discussions with a range of companies.”
The Times also reports that Boscombe Down, north of Salisbury, is intended to be used as the airfield for flights.
However, it is understood it still requires considerable investment to improve fencing and security.
READ MORE: UK Government facing legal action over income threshold visa plans
Any further complications to the Rwanda scheme would prove a major headache for the Prime Minister, who is battling to see flights take off before the next General Election, expected before January 2025.
Sunak moved a step forward this week in his efforts to revive the Rwanda scheme after the Supreme Court defeat.
He managed to see off threats of a backbench rebellion to comfortably pass his emergency legislation in the Commons at the second reading.
However, the contentious bill is expected to see opposition from the Lords and backbenchers across different wings of the party next year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel