THE Scotland Office has spent an “eye-watering” £290,000 on travel and hotels in the space of a year, the Sunday National can reveal.
Our analysis of the department’s government procurement card (GPC) transactions and quarterly transparency returns revealed that Alister Jack’s officials charged hundreds of thousands of pounds worth of travel on the public purse in the space of 12 months.
The highest single amount lodged was £49,310.66 in April 2023, paid to CTM (Corporate Travel Management). It is not clear what these payments were for, as they are simply labelled “travel”.
READ MORE: Question Time: Ex Yes strategist says Scottish independence 'may take 20 years'
The Scotland Office insisted that payments made to CTM were not single transactions, and are invoiced payments for corporate travel. However, they would not provide a breakdown for any of the eight instances where this appeared in transparency data.
Overall, payments to CTM came to over £270,000.
The SNP said the Scotland Office should be clearer on what these transactions were for, and that they should be willing to demonstrate they were being “cost-efficient” with their travel spending.
The UK Government is required to publish spending on GPCs above £500 and £25,000 on its official website each month.
GPCs are not credit cards, but a way for officials to pay for goods and services, with a £100,000 monthly limit set for each UK department.
Other charges on the Scotland Office’s GPC transactions data related to payments including Facebook adverts and rent.
Collating this information, as each month is published separately, the Sunday National found that between December 2022 and November 2023, an astounding £290,276.39 was spent on travel and accommodation by the Scotland Office.
The second highest payment was for £43,378.95 in March 2023, followed by £42,300.77 in November, and £33,147.34 in December 2022. All three were labelled “travel” for the Scotland Office, but no further details about what this referred to were published in the data.
Other travel costs ranged from between £25,000 to almost £30,000 across 2023.
READ MORE: Leonardo UK: Scottish factory urged to stop providing arms to Israel
There were four payments made to British Airways in March for foreign travel, totalling £4708.04, but again no location was disclosed.
And, there were an additional five payments made for accommodation, totalling £7311.97. This included £2857.12 to the Sofitel Metropole Hotel, a luxury five-star hotel in Hanoi, Vietnam, and £870.39 to the Sofitel Plaza Saigon in Ho Chi Minh City, also five stars, paid in October.
Jack embarked on a trade trip alongside the Scotch Whisky Association that month, according to a press release on the UK Government’s website.
Arcotel, a four-star hotel group with premises across Austria and Germany, was paid £2418.33 in March, but it is unclear which of the eleven sites officials stayed at.
Accommodation through Booking.com in January cost £533.45, while a stay at the Clarion Post Hotel in Gothenburg, that same month, totalled £632.68.
“These sums are pretty eye-watering,” Tommy Sheppard, the SNP’s Scotland spokesperson at Westminster told the Sunday National.
“This is either a small number of people travelling very far in a great deal of luxury, or it's a huge number of people travelling economy.
“It is not clear.”
READ MORE: Scottish comedian Paul Black's set to be shown on BBC on Christmas Day
Sheppard suggested it would be simple for the Scotland Office to be more transparent about its travel and spending, rather than the way information is currently disclosed.
He added: “It's silly, isn't it? Because whenever they play games like this, you have to ask what have they got to hide.
“Why don't they just try and demonstrate that it was done in the most cost-efficient way possible?”
When the Sunday National asked the Scotland Office what the payments of tens of thousands of pounds were for, and if they would provide clarity, the department would only say that it was for a mixture of domestic and foreign travel.
They said that some of the payments related to travel between offices in Queen Elizabeth House (above), Edinburgh, and Dover House, London, and others were ministerial trade trips.
However, they would not give any further details, only stating that the Scottish Government reports its travel expenditure in a similar form.
A UK Government spokesperson said: “The Scotland Office plays a vital role in promoting the best interests of Scotland within a strong United Kingdom and effectively representing Scotland's interests at the heart of the UK Government.
“Our transparency data is published in accordance with established procedures across Whitehall.”
READ MORE: Experts issue warning as Scottish Government in £1.5bn Budget black hole
Sheppard said that he had concerns that Scotland Office officials are “resistant” to talking about anything that is “particular, singular and distinctive” about Scotland during trade trips abroad.
“They just want to see Scotland as part of the Great Britain campaign, which is pretty sad, really,” he said.
“Because even if you didn't believe in independence, you've got to accept that Scotland's got some great brands that are going to work an awful lot better if they're promoted distinctively and by themselves.”
We previously told how unelected lord Malcolm Offord was branded an “expensive waste of space” after we revealed the details of his flashy trade trip to India alongside then-foreign secretary Liz Truss in 2021.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel