SNP MP John Nicolson has said he was “booked and then cancelled” for a BBC radio programme after he grilled the Government’s choice to become the corporation’s new chair.
The MP for Ochil and South Perthshire was among those to question Samir Shah during his hearing with the Culture, Media and Sport Committee.
Nicolson asked Shah if there should be members of political parties on the BBC board, which was initially met with a long pause.
He replied: “I’m very clear about news and current affairs and I’m not so clear about the board.”
I was booked and then cancelled by the BBC #r4today programme for tomorrow morning after grilling the Tory choice for BBC Chair today. The BBC producer cited time issues. Well - the show is only three hours long……
— JOHN NICOLSON M.P. (@MrJohnNicolson) December 14, 2023
Have a look at the BBC producer texts to me. Almost funny. https://t.co/ASqPj3b1qZ
Shah then later added he would look into it and “come up with some view on it” while Nicolson said he wanted to hear the view before Shah was appointed to the role.
In a post on Twitter/X, the SNP MP explained that he was initially asked to go on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme before this was cancelled.
He said: “I was booked and then cancelled by the BBC #r4today programme for tomorrow (Thursday) morning after grilling the Tory choice for BBC chair today.
READ MORE: BBC Question Time: Who is on tonight's show in Kelso?
“The BBC producer cited time issues. Well – the show is only three hours long… Have a look at the BBC producer texts to me. Almost funny.”
The images showed a series of texts in which Nicolson is initially asked to appear on the programme on Thursday morning to speak about Shah’s appearance in front of the committee.
The MP then said he would appear on the programme before a separate image showed another text cancelling his appearance.
It said: “Hi John, I’m a producer for the Today programme, really sorry but we won’t be able to have you on the programme tomorrow. Have an issue with our timings.”
Specifically, Nicolson said he had asked Shah about Robbie Gibb, who previously worked as Theresa May's press secretary.
Former Newsnight presenter Emily Maitlis (below) previously described Gibb, who was appointed to the BBC's board by Boris Johnson's government, as an "active agent of the Conservative Party," who was shaping the corporation's content.
Asked if he thought it was appropriate that Gibb "lectured" Newsnight staff on how to be more impartial, Shah said: "I do not need to hear everyone else's account of it, including Sir Robbie's account of it.
"I cant, if I were chair, make a decision without actually gathering the facts and evidence yourself."
He also added that it would not be appropriate for members of the BBC board to lobby the culture secretary over who should be the head of Ofcom.
It comes after Nadine Dorries alleged in her recent book that Gibb lobbied her when she was in the post to appoint Lord Gilbert to the role.
"It would not be anything to do with them, Ofcom are the regulators," he said.
The BBC declined to comment on Nicolson's accusations.
Elsewhere, Shah had said that Gary Lineker’s (above) recent tweets about politicians appear to breach the BBC’s social media guidelines.
The former England footballer hit back at Grant Shapps after the Defence Secretary questioned whether the Match of the Day presenter should express political views.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel