THE Alba Party will lodge a parliamentary motion urging the Scottish Government to halt legal action over the Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill.
Ash Regan, the party’s only MSP, will request ministers scrap any plans to roll out the bill after the Court of Session ruled the UK Government could lawfully block the legislation last week.
The GRR Bill was passed by two-thirds of MSPs in the Scottish Parliament in December 2022 but was subsequently stopped from becoming law after Scottish Secretary Alister Jack made the unprecedented decision to use a Section 35 order.
Jack raised concerns the reforms could adversely impact on UK equality law.
As the powers to legislate over gender reforms are devolved to the Scottish Parliament, the Scottish Government took the UK Government to court over its decision, leading to a two-day showdown in the Court of Session in September this year.
READ MORE: 'Depressing' Labour agree with hike to overseas worker salary threshold
But Judge Lady Haldane gave her official ruling on the case last Friday and said UK ministers did have the right to block the reforms.
The case could now end up in the Supreme Court if the Scottish Government decides to appeal.
Regan, who resigned from the Government in opposition to the bill last year, insisted ministers will lose the support of the country if they keep pursuing the policy.
She said: “I had previously warned the Scottish Government that they were attempting to face down Westminster on an issue that they would lose.
“Many high-profile incidents have now showed us that the Gender Recognition Reforms proposed are not fit for purpose.
“Hundreds of thousands of pounds have already been wasted and it would be unimaginable for the Scottish Government to appeal this decision and then ultimately proceed to a situation of potentially asking the UK Supreme Court to overturn a decision of Scotland’s highest court.
READ MORE: SNP: Scotland is potentially missing out on billions from EU
“The Scottish Government lost the battle in court and they will further lose the support of the people of Scotland if they keep pursuing this policy.
“I urge Humza Yousaf to now completely scrap his Government’s gender reforms.”
The Scottish Government has 21 days from the day of the decision to make a call on whether to appeal.
The legislation – which was passed by a cross-party majority at Holyrood - would make it easier for people to change their legally-recognised sex.
It would remove the need for trans people to be diagnosed with gender dysphoria by a doctor before they are allowed to change their legally-recognised sex in Scotland, and would lower the age that someone can apply for a gender recognition certificate from 18 to 16.
The period in which applicants would need to have lived in their acquired gender would be cut from two years to three months.
The Alba motion, which MSPs will be able to sign, will read: “That the Parliament notes the outcome of the Court of Session’s decision that the Secretary of State for Scotland’s use of the provision set out in Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998 was lawful, regrets that the Scottish Parliament brought forward legislation that was so fundamentally flawed that it allowed the UK Government the opportunity to challenge the legislation, notes the views of women across Scotland that the Gender Recognition Reform Act is a risk to the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls, notes that the Scottish Government have spent a considerable amount of public funds to date on legal costs in its attempt to roll out this legislation, and calls on the Scottish Government to now halt any further legal action and to dispose of any intention to roll out the Gender Recognition Reform Act.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel