ALISTER Jack has welcomed the Court of Session’s ruling that the UK Government can block Scotland’s gender reforms from becoming law.
The Scottish Secretary made the decision to use a Section 35 order to prevent the Gender Recognition Reform Bill from becoming law, despite it being supported by a majority of MSPs.
The unilateral decision was challenged by the Scottish Government, but a Court of Session ruling on Friday said it was lawful.
Welcoming the ruling from Lady Shona Haldane, Jack said: “I welcome the court’s judgment, which upholds my decision to prevent the Scottish Government’s gender recognition legislation from becoming law.
READ MORE: Read the full ruling as court says UK Government CAN block Scottish gender bill
“I was clear that this legislation would have had adverse effects on the operation of the law as it applies to reserved matters, including on important Great Britain-wide equality protections.
“Following this latest court defeat for the Scottish Government, their ministers need to stop wasting taxpayers’ money pursuing needless legal action and focus on the real issues which matter to people in Scotland – such as growing the economy and cutting waiting lists.”
The Scottish Conservatives, who were the only party in Holyrood not to support the reforms, also welcomed the ruling.
Meghan Gallacher (below), the group's depute leader, called on the SNP to "listen to the court".
She said: “This is a humiliating defeat for Humza Yousaf and the SNP, who have once again squandered taxpayers’ cash on a self-serving but doomed court case.
“Their reckless Gender Recognition Reform Bill is deeply unpopular with the Scottish public because its self-ID principle compromises the safety of women and girls – as the case of a double-rapist being sent to a female prison demonstrated.
“In addition, the bill impacted on equalities law south of the border, which is why the UK Government had no option but to issue a Section 35 Order.
“Rather than taking that as a cue to redraft their flawed bill, the SNP dug their heels and turned an issue of women’s safety into another constitutional grievance – a cynical tactic which has backfired today.
READ MORE: Cabinet Office refuses to say if Union committee has even MET under Rishi Sunak
“Humza Yousaf must now listen to the court, as well as the court of public opinion, not appeal this ruling and ditch the Bill for good. We all want to see the lives of trans people improved but that can’t come at the expense of the hard-won rights of women and girls.”
Writing on Twitter/X, Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross said: "The SNP choose to turn an issue fo women's safety into a constitutional grievance - wasting taxpayers' money on a self-serving and doomed court case.
"Humza Yousaf must listen to the court, and to the public, and ditch his government's gender self-ID bill."
Meanwhile, Labour’s shadow Scottish secretary Ian Murray (below) commented: “It is disappointing that this legislation ended in the courts but this ruling should be respected.
“It is shameful that after years of debate, trans people feel no more protected and women no more reassured.
“This is another demonstration of why both governments have to work together rather than spending taxpayers’ money fighting in courts and pitting communities against each other.”
Maggie Chapman, the Scottish Greens MSP and equality spokesperson, said the ruling showed the "huge limitations and constraints on devolution".
"This is a devastating day for equality. It is a democratic outrage, crushing basic rights and equality for some of Scotland’s most marginalised people," she said.
“It is horrible, it is heartbreaking and it is unjust. It makes a mockery of any vote or decision that we as parliamentarians take at Holyrood from now on, if the result is knowing that Westminster will veto anything they don’t like."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel