VODAFONE, EE, Three and O2 customers could soon receive a payout of nearly £2000 as the mobile phone companies face claims of overcharging.
The UK's four largest mobile phone network operators are facing a more than £3.2 billion class action claim for allegedly using their market dominance to overcharge on up to 28.2 million UK mobile phone contracts.
Justin Gutmann, a former executive with Citizens Advice, and law firm Charles Lyndon claims that Vodafone, EE, Three and O2 charged “loyalty penalties,” leaving existing customers paying more than new customers for the same services.
READ MORE: Question Time: Humza Yousaf hits back as Labour MP defends Starmer's praise for Thatcher
It specifically claims that long-standing customers were overcharged for handsets beyond the end of their contractual term.
Gutmann alleges the firms overcharged on up to 28.2m contracts and is seeking damages of at least £3.285bn.
Vodafone, EE, Three and O2 customers could be owed nearly £2,000
If successful, a customer who bought a contract with Vodafone, EE, Three or O2 made up of a mobile phone and services such as data, minutes and calls could receive as much as £1823.
When these contracts are agreed upon, their price during the minimum term of the contract includes the cost of both the phone and the use of airtime services.
The claim alleges that the firms failed to reduce the overall amount charged once the minimum contractual term expired, despite the fact that consumers had already paid off their phones.
This resulted in existing customers being charged more than a new customer would be if they were just paying for airtime services.
The class action has been filed with the Competition Appeal Tribunal in London.
All qualifying customers will be automatically included in the claim for free unless they follow specific steps to opt out.
Gutmann said: “I’m launching this class action because I believe these four mobile phone companies have systematically exploited millions of loyal customers across the UK through loyalty penalties, taking over £3bn out of the pockets of hard-working people and their families.
“These companies kept taking advantage of customers despite the financial crisis of 2008, Covid and now the cost-of-living crisis. It’s time they were held to account.”
Vodafone, EE, Three and O2 respond to claims they overcharged customers
The four mobile phone giants - Vodafone, EE, Three and O2 have commented about the latest claims.
An O2 spokesman said: “To date there has been no contact with our legal team on this claim.
"However, we are proud to have been the first provider to have launched split contracts a decade ago which automatically and fully reduce customers’ bills once they’ve paid off their handset.
“We’ve long been calling for an end to the ‘smartphone swindle’ and for other mobile operators to stop the pernicious practice of charging their customers for phones they already own.”
An EE spokeswoman said: “We strongly disagree with the speculative claim being brought against us.
"EE offers a range of tariffs and a robust process for dealing with end-of-contract notifications.
“The UK mobile market is highly competitive space with some of the lowest pricing across Europe.”
Vodafone added: “This has just been brought to our attention and we don’t yet have sufficient detail for our legal team to assess.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here