JOANNA Cherry has launched a bid to give Holyrood the power to radically alter the role of Scotland’s top lawyer.
The SNP MP is seeking to give MSPs a say in the role of the Lord Advocate, who as well as being the Scottish Government’s top law officer is also in charge of prosecutions.
There are concerns about both roles being filled by one person and the Scottish Government has commissioned Malcolm McMillan, a former chief executive of the Scottish Law Commission, to conduct research into splitting up the position.
But Holyrood lacks the power to split the functions of the Lord Advocate.
The SNP MP has been given permission to introduce a bill in the Commons to make the change.
READ MORE: Pro-ceasefire protest greets Keir Starmer as he arrives into Glasgow
Cherry said: “The role and function of Scotland’s chief law officer is reserved to Westminster.
“The straitjacket of the Scotland Act has prevented the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government from modernising the post, as it might have done since 1999, by splitting the dual roles of providing independent legal advice to the Government of the day and that of head of the prosecution service in Scotland.
“All major political parties in Scotland have called for a review of the role of the Lord Advocate and I trust that my bill will have cross party backing when it comes before the Commons.”
The bill will be heard on January 10.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel