HOLYROOD officials have refused to say if they will investigate Alex Cole-Hamilton after he reportedly tried to take part in a debate from outside the parliament bar.
The Scottish LibDem leader sparked a row after using his phone to raise a point of order during a debate last week, but appeared to be dialling in from outside Margo’s, the Holyrood bar just off the Garden Lobby, and a 60-second walk from the Chamber.
MSPs jeered at Cole-Hamilton as he made the blunder, with the SNP and Tories calling for him to apologise in the wake of the row.
READ MORE: Scottish Government loses court battle over Nicola Sturgeon documents
And now, Scottish Parliament authorities have refused to say if any official complaints were made regarding Cole-Hamilton’s conduct in the Holyrood Chamber, and if the Presiding Officer has the authority to investigate him.
We told how the LibDem leader dialled in just after votes had been cast on Labour MSP Pam Duncan-Glancy’s Proposed Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill.
Appearing on the big screen in the chamber, Cole-Hamilton could be seen repeatedly touching his hair and apologised for being “unable to connect”.
Liam McArthur, deputy presiding officer and fellow LibDem, could be seen shaking his head at his boss.
Several MSPs could be heard laughing and jeering as the incident occurred.
But - despite numerous calls for Cole-Hamilton to apologise - the LibDem leader is unlikely to face any punishment.
A Scottish Parliament spokesperson told The National: “Rule 2.7 of the Standing Orders sets out that Members can take part in any meetings of the Parliament remotely.
“Any decision to participate in business in the Chamber or remotely is a matter for Members themselves.”
The spokesperson refused to comment any further on whether any complaints had been lodged or the possibility of an investigation by Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone.
READ MORE: Live updates as Boris Johnson faces UK Covid-19 Inquiry
Cole-Hamilton has remained quiet on the row on social media, but told the Scottish Sun he had apologised to McArthur for not arriving in the chamber in time to vote in person.
“I take the proceedings of Parliament very seriously. My voting record speaks for itself in casting my ballot every time that I possibly can,” he said in a statement.
“MSPs regularly vote remotely and on this occasion, fewer than a third were present to vote in person.
“After decision time, I immediately sought out the deputy presiding officer to apologise for not arriving at the chamber in time.”
Previously, the Scottish LibDems refused to say if their leader had been drinking ahead of the incident.
The SNP said Cole-Hamilton’s behaviour was “disgraceful” and the public “rightly expect” politicians to show respect for their position as an elected member.
Scottish Tory chief whip Alexander Burnett said that Cole-Hamilton had some “serious explaining to do” and called for him to apologise.
READ MORE: Speaker apologises for 'leader of Scottish nationalists' error at PMQs
We told how SNP MSP John Mason called on Johnstone to seek an explanation and apology from the Scottish LibDem leader.
Mason told The National his understanding was that if MSPs were in the Scottish Parliament building, they were required to attend the chamber to vote, speak or take part in debates in any form.
He said that previous instances of MSPs taking part remotely from their offices had been “clamped down on” by officials.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel