ANAS Sarwar has condemned Margaret Thatcher’s legacy in Scotland – but defended Keir Starmer’s comments praising her.
In an article for the Sunday Telegraph, the UK Labour leader said the former Tory prime minister brought “meaningful change” and “sought to drag Britain out of its stupor by setting loose our natural entrepreneurialism”.
This led to fury from both Labour and SNP politicians, with First Minister Humza Yousaf slamming the comments as an “insult” to Scottish communities who were decimated by her policies. SNP Westminster group leader Stephen Flynn, meanwhile, challenged Sarwar over whether he supported Starmer’s comments.
Outside Pollokshaws Burgh Hall on Tuesday morning, the Scottish Labour leader was quick to attack Thatcher’s legacy in Scotland.
READ MORE: Rutherglen by-election: Anas Sarwar can't resist a pop at The National
“Let me be really clear, Margaret Thatcher was a destructive force for our country. She decimated communities across Scotland and in many parts of the UK,” he said.
But Sarwar then defended Starmer’s comments, urging the public to “actually read the article rather than the headline or opposition attacks”.
He also refused to say whether Starmer got it “wrong” for Scottish voters, and when asked by journalists if his apparent praise could be seen as pandering to Tory voters, or alienating Scots, he said: “By its very nature, we have to persuade people who have voted for other political parties to vote for your political party in any future election.”
He went on: “I would remind those opposition parties, though, that it was [former first minister] Alex Salmond that said Scotland didn’t have a problem with Margaret Thatcher’s economic policy – where was Humza Yousaf and Stephen Flynn then?”
In 2008, while leader of the SNP, Salmond said Scotland “didn’t mind the economic side” of Thatcher’s tenure, but rejected the “social side”.
Sarwar went on say that Thatcher would find the current Tory UK Government “unpalatable”.
He said: “We were right to oppose her then and we’re right to oppose this modern-day Thatcherite Conservative Party – actually a Conservative Party that’s gone so extreme that I imagine even Margaret Thatcher would find them unpalatable.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel