LIZ Truss is set to put forward a US right-wing style draft law seeking to ban transgender women from female bathrooms.
The former Tory prime minister, who only spent 49 days in office and crashed the UK economy, was among 20 MPs who have been selected to put forward a Private Member’s Bill in the House of Commons.
This is separate from the UK Government's agenda, and allows for MPs of any political party to bring forward proposals.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour silent as Keir Starmer praises Margaret Thatcher
Earlier this year, SNP MP Stuart McDonald topped the ballot and was able to introduce legislation guaranteeing paid leave for parents of premature babies.
According to aides, Truss will use the opportunity to propose a bill that would "legally exclude biological men" from single sex spaces designated for women, including toilets and changing rooms.
There are already provisions for single sex spaces in the Equality Act 2010.
The move comes after the right-wing politician visited Washington DC in the US, where she even made an appearance on Fox News.
Conservative leadership and the Anglo-American alliance are vital. I'm in Washington DC with @MPIainDS, @JackLopresti, Mark Francois and Lord Howard for talks with Republican counterparts.
— Liz Truss (@trussliz) November 29, 2023
We must defeat the axis of authoritarian regimes threatening the free world. pic.twitter.com/wQmPMp9xO3
Several states in America, including Idaho, Arkansas, Alabama, Oklahoma and Tennessee, have introduced anti-transgender bathroom laws since 2021.
Truss's draft legislation will also aim to prevent under-18s from accessing hormone therapy and block the state from recognising social transitioning by those under this age, according to sources.
Scotland's gender reforms had included plans to allow 16 and 17-year-olds the ability to legally change their gender, with some stricter requirements than those aged over 18, before they were blocked from becoming law by the UK Government.
Truss confirmed the move on Twitter/X, writing: "This week I will present a Private Members' Bill to Parliament. The Bill would protect single-sex spaces in law.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer downplays Margaret Thatcher praise in BBC interview
"It would also protect children and teenagers from making irreversible decisions about their bodies."
Truss was 18th among the names revealed in the ballot last month, meaning there is no guarantee that her Bill will even be debated in the Commons.
Normally, only the first seven balloted Bills will have time to be included in a day’s debate and therefore have the highest chance of becoming law.
A source close to Truss told the PA news agency: “In her time as minister for women and equalities, Liz successfully blocked dangerous plans to allow gender self-ID.
“It has become increasingly clear there is a need for the law to better protect children and teenagers from making irreversible decisions about their bodies which they might come to regret.
“The law also needs to be amended in order to make it clear that biological males should be legally excluded from having access to single-sex spaces designated for women, including toilets, changing rooms, refuges and prisons.
“Liz decided to put forward these proposals after considering the amount of correspondence she receives on these issues and taking soundings from her South West Norfolk constituents.
“These are not party political issues and she hopes to bring together a broad cross-party alliance in support of her Bill.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf: Keir Starmer's praise of Margaret Thatcher an 'insult'
The contents of the Bill, news of which was first reported by the Mail On Sunday, will be formally presented to the House Commons on Wednesday, along with a list of its MP backers.
Julie Elliott, Labour MP for Sunderland Central, came first in the ballot and will have top priority to bring forward a legislative proposal.
A spokesperson for Stonewall hit back at Truss's proposals:
"As prejudice and hate crime against trans people rise, it's important to remember that trans people make up 0.5% of the population, and have been lawfully using the facilities of their acquired gender in Great Britain since the 20th Century.
"Meanwhile a leading pediatrician is conducting a review of how to improve healthcare services for trans and gender questioning young people. This proposed Bill appears to be a knee jerk reaction to a moral panic, rather than something that would benefit the general public in any way."
A UK Government spokeswoman said: “This Government is clear of the fundamental importance of biological sex.
“The Equality Act already allows single-sex spaces to be restricted on the basis of sex where that is justified, and the EHRC (Equality and Human Rights Commission) has published extensive guidance to support providers.
“NHS England is also making significant improvements to children’s gender identity services to protect children, including consulting on measures to severely restrict, the prescribing of puberty blockers to children aged 16 and under.
“As set out in the Cass Review’s interim report, social transition is not a neutral act, so any decision to social transition should be in the best interests of the individual.”
We previously told how the UK's human rights watchdog the EHRC is currently under special review due to its treatment of transgender people, and lack of political neutrality from the Government, and could face losing its seat on some United Nations committees.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel