FORMER first minister Nicola Sturgeon has hit back at Matt Hancock’s Covid inquiry jibe where he accused her of “spin”.
The former UK health secretary told the UK Covid Inquiry on Friday morning that Sturgeon had “confused” the public during the Covid pandemic.
Hancock also claimed Sturgeon would announce decisions sooner than had been agreed to.
READ MORE: John Byrne: Legendary Scottish artist dies at 83
The former SNP leader, who was lauded and criticised for her communication skills with her daily briefings during the pandemic, has now hit back at Hancock’s claims during his second day of giving evidence to the probe.
A spokesperson for Sturgeon said: “There is not a scrap of evidence for Matt Hancock’s claims.
“He should be taking responsibility for his own decisions – as Nicola will do when she gives evidence to the Inquiry early next year – rather than seeking to blame others.
“Nicola communicated openly and frankly with the people of Scotland on a daily basis.
“It was her duty in the grave situation we faced to take and communicate clearly the decisions necessary to protect the country as far as possible. She was accountable to the Scottish people in discharging that duty, not to Matt Hancock.”
Earlier, Hancock was asked about text messages where he said he was concerned about “the Scots” making early announcements.
Claire Mitchell KC, acting on behalf of the Scottish covid bereaved, probed Hancock on why it was an issue that the Scottish people were told first.
“There were a number of moments when the first minister of Scotland would communicate in a way that was unhelpful and confusing to the public and sometimes would leave a meeting and begin communication of a decision for instance sooner than agreed,” he said.
READ MORE: King Charles slammed as 'hypocrite' after COP28 speech
“In contrast to my warmth towards my health counterparts, we then found it much more difficult when decisions went up to first minister level, particularly with Nicola Sturgeon because we would find some kind of spin was put on what was essentially, substantively the same decision.”
Hancock also told the Inquiry that relations with Scotland’s then health secretary Jeane Freeman were better and had “no recollection” of communication plans with her or her officials being “breached”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel