THE UK’s human rights watchdog is under review and faces losing its seat on a United Nations council over its approach to transgender rights.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has come under fire from LGBT charities over its lack of political independence from the Tory Government.
Previously, the EHRC has been accused of “actively harming” transgender people in the UK by Stonewall and others. Concerns were also raised over chair Baroness Kishwer Falkner considering proposals by ministers to change the legal definition of “sex” in the Equality Act.
READ MORE: BBC apologises after 'editing errors' in Gaza report
And now, after a complaint by Stonewall and 30 other LGBT charities, the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) has launched a special review of the institution.
The charities claimed that the EHRC was a “failed institution” and its work was “undermining the status of independent human rights institutions and systems”.
Writing in the Telegraph, cross-party peer Falkner said the EHRC was facing an “obstacle” to its accreditation as an A-status human rights organisation due to the challenge.
The EHRC could lose its seat at the UN Human Rights Council and other UN bodies.
Falkner said she was “disappointed” and claimed charities had “targeted” the EHRC over its advice on the Equality Act.
She wrote: “Our advice on this complex and divisive issue made clear that government should lean towards a biological definition of sex as the fairest way of protecting everyone’s rights, but that it should carefully identify and consider the potential implications of any such change.
“We were saddened to see that Stonewall and other campaigners chose to ‘go low’ with unsubstantiated claims about matters which have little to do with the daily lives of the people or groups who we are there to protect, instead of engaging with us to discuss our proposals to improve the balance of rights and protections.”
She later refuted allegations that the EHRC is “in cahoots” with the UK Government by “seeking to erode the rights of trans people”.
READ MORE: Michael Shanks joins Labour front bench as shadow Scotland minister
Stonewall, in a statement after the review was announced, said they had concerns about the EHRC’s approach to trans rights and its political independence “for some time”.
Robbie de Santos, director of external affairs at the LGBT charity, welcomed the review and said Stonewall will “continue to support it with evidence”.
He added: “At its periodic review in October 2022, the EHRC received a number of clear recommendations regarding the independence and effectiveness of its work in respect of the rights of LGBTI people, and their cooperation with LGBTI organisations.
“Within months of receiving these recommendations, they were already demonstrating that they were falling short, which then prompted Stonewall and 30 LGBTQ+ and human rights organisations to provide evidence of their concerns once again to GANHRI.
READ MORE: David Cameron slammed for Commons absence amid Gaza question
“All countries need effective, independent national human rights institutions to promote and protect human rights. With anti-trans hate crime and prejudice rising, and Britain sliding down the international rankings on LGBTQ+ rights, LGBTQ+ people in Great Britain need a more robust and independent human rights watchdog.
“We hope that this special review will give EHRC the scrutiny and recommendations it needs to play the part our communities deserve.”
We told how the EHRC’s plans to change the Equality Act were described as “pure transphobia” by a former legal director of the group.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel