A TORY councillor has called for a “dog DNA database” in an effort to tackle high levels of dog poo on the streets of Scotland’s capital.
The proposed scheme could see dog owners having to register their canines with Edinburgh City Council, which could test samples of poo found left in the street and issue fines accordingly.
Councillor Christopher Cowdy said everything the council has done so far to address the issue “hasn’t seemed to work”.
The Conservative councillor will table a motion at the Transport and Environment Committee on Thursday calling for a report on “the practicalities of establishing a dog DNA register for the city, how it could be enforced, likely costs to set up and run, and how much might be funded through issuance of fines”.
He admitted it “might take a couple of years” to get up and running but said Edinburgh could be the “vanguard for combating the national problem”.
In the three years to December 2022 there were on average 1288 street cleansing requests relating to dog fouling each year in the city.
And although the council already has the powers to issue fixed penalty notices of £80 to offenders, only four were issued by authority in 2021, which Cowdy said reflected “the difficulties prosecuting under the current regime”.
He said: “I suppose I thought about a dog DNA test as being the only real way you can make out for definite whose dog did what.
“The general idea I’m thinking of is there would be an Edinburgh by-law that would require dog owners to register their dogs with the city council who would hold a database.
“You would be obliged to bring your dog, a DNA swab would be picked up from the dog and recorded on the database, and then if there could be a team of wardens searching for dog foul they would pick it up, take a test from it and hopefully track it down.”
Cowdy said officials confirmed to him the idea was “practically feasible”.
He said: “There are obviously issues that most responsible dog owners pick up after their dog anyway and irresponsible dog owners might not be inclined to register their dog in the first place.”
But he added it was a “big problem” that had to be addressed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel