THE First Minister has promised a “robust defence” to Tory claims that he and Shona Robison misled Holyrood in a row over pandemic WhatsApp messages.
Humza Yousaf and the Deputy First Minister were accused of misleading MSPs by Douglas Ross during First Minister’s Questions (FMQs) last week.
Yousaf had initially said the UK Covid Inquiry requested messages to be handed over in September, but a timeline published by the Scottish Government later showed this was February.
READ MORE: Holyrood launches data review as Michael Matheson iPad bill published
The FM conceded that officials had initially interpreted the request for electronic messages “too narrowly”.
The Scottish Tories have insisted that as MSPs were previously told the initial request was made in September, Yousaf and Robison had therefore misled Parliament.
Douglas Ross has put forward a motion, to be debated in Holyrood on Wednesday afternoon, calling for both Yousaf and Robison to refer themselves to the independent adviser, to determine if they have breached the ministerial code.
The code requires ministers to give “accurate and truthful information” to Parliament.
Speaking ahead of the debate, Yousaf said he would “listen to Parliament once it makes a decision” on the matter.
He told the PA news agency: “We will be very robust in that debate and, of course, neither the Deputy First Minister or I have misled Parliament.
“We have provided full context of the requests that have been made and, most importantly, what people care about, is have we handed over the material we had in our possession? The answer to that is absolutely, yes.”
The Scottish Government handed over 14,000 messages to the inquiry, including unredacted correspondence from the First Minister.
READ MORE: James Cleverly says Rwanda plan will go ahead despite court ruling
Yousaf insisted this was in “very stark contrast” to the UK Government, which lost a court case over giving the inquiry access to messages.
The FM went on to accuse the Tories of raising the issue to “distract from the complete boorach, the chaos, that is engulfing their own party” at Westminster.
Yousaf suggested that if ministers referred themselves for a possible breach of the code “every time the opposition demanded it then the advisers would not have anything else to do, they would be busy with constant referrals”.
The SNP leader said: “I have lost count of how many times the opposition have demanded SNP ministers refer themselves.
“This is also just an attempt by the Conservatives to distract from the complete boorach, the chaos, that is engulfing their own party down in the UK Government.”
He added: “We will robustly defend our position in the debate this afternoon, let’s see what Parliament concludes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel