FIRST Minister Humza Yousaf has rejected claims he and his deputy misled Holyrood about WhatsApp messages during the Covid pandemic.
Pressed by Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross at a fiery First Minister’s Questions on Thursday, Yousaf did admit that the Government had interpreted requests for messages from the UK Covid-19 Inquiry “too narrowly”.
It comes after it emerged on Wednesday that the UK Covid-19 Inquiry had asked the Scottish Government for “communications relating to key decisions” including emails, texts and WhatsApp messages in February 2023.
Scottish ministers have consistently said they did not make key decisions over WhatsApp during the pandemic.
READ MORE: George Osborne reveals bizarre Queen intervention in bagpipe cut plan
In a statement to Holyrood last week, Robison said the inquiry only asked for summaries of WhatsApp groups in June, saying this was followed up in September with a request for messages exchanged in the groups.
Yousaf has since repeated her statement, leading to accusations from opposition parties that the pair had “deliberately misled” Parliament.
Asked to admit he “didn’t tell the truth” by Ross, the First Minister said: “I absolutely refute that.”
He added: “Clearly, I was talking about specific WhatsApp groups.
“What I do accept fully from the inquiry is that we have interpreted their requests too narrowly and subsequently having done so we have then supplied 14,000 messages to the inquiry.”
After the Tory leader repeated the question, Yousaf said his party “don’t fear scrutiny”.
He added: “I suspect his party absolutely does.”
The SNP leader then fired back at Ross (above) and said he should be “ashamed” of his previous support of ex-prime minister Boris Johnson.
He said: “What I can say with total confidence is that there wasn't a single Scottish Government minister that said: ‘Let the bodies pile up high’”
“That was none other than Boris Johnson, who Douglas Ross defended to the hilt and claimed was honest. He should be ashamed.”
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar also led on the controversy over the UK and Scottish Covid inquiries, but chose to focus on legal advice given to the Scottish government during the pandemic.
He said the UK inquiry had raised concerns that it had not been submitted in full and in some cases was almost entirely redacted.
Sarwar accused the government of "hiding" the legal advice and said it was an “affront to Covid victims and their families”.
Yousaf said he disagreed they had not co-operated and said he expected all evidence, including legal advice, to be handed over when requested.
The First Minister then confirmed the redactions had been made due to issues around legal privilege, adding: “Therefore, of course, a discussion would have to take place with our law officers in relation to what can be unredacted.
“Where we can absolutely send information unredacted, it is my full expectation as the individual who leads the Government that the information is provided in full, in unredacted form.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel