WORKING with Boris Johnson’s “brutal and useless” team was like “taming wild animals”, the two most senior civil servants who worked with the former prime minister have said.
Cabinet Secretary Simon Case said that Johnson and his inner circle were “basically feral”, messages shown to the Covid Inquiry on Wednesday revealed.
The exchange was the latest damning assessment of Johnson’s administration that Case made with his predecessor as the head of the Civil Service, Lord Mark Sedwill.
Lord Sedwill - who also told the inquiry he wanted Matt Hancock sacked as health secretary - complained that Johnson’s administration was “brutal and useless”, according to an August 2020 extract from the diary of former chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance.
The peer said he does not remember saying those words but added: “I can’t actually recall what might have prompted it but… I don’t doubt Sir Patrick’s memory. It must have been a moment of acute frustration with something.”
READ MORE: Government insists Israel support is 'not a blank cheque'
Case, days before joining No 10 in May 2020, shared his concerns with the then-cabinet secretary.
“Honestly, Mark, I don’t want to go near these people. If as part of all this there are some guarantees about behaviour, I will give it a go for a very short period.”
Lord Sedwill then gave him some advice about how to handle Johnson’s former top adviser Dominic Cummings “so he can’t run interference”.
Later, in June 2020, Case wrote to Lord Sedwill: “It is like taming wild animals. Nothing in my past experience has prepared me for this madness.
“The PM and the people he chooses to surround himself with are basically feral.”
Lord Sedwill (below) replied: “I have the bite marks.”
Messages previously shown to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry show Case describing people working in No 10 as “mad” and “poisonous” as he prepared to take over as Cabinet Secretary in September 2020.
Lord Sedwill told the inquiry how he was pressured to leave that role over a series of leaks and “distortions” spread about him by those around Johnson.
Johnson spoke to him on May 14, 2020, about standing down, but Lord Sedwill was concerned leaving would “undoubtedly be destabilising”, particularly in such an acute crisis.
READ MORE: Home Office says revealing cost of royal family protection could 'aid attacks
He said colleagues urged him to “stick it out”, but he thought it was also “destabilising for the system to have constant hostile attacks on the cabinet secretary and also the office of the cabinet secretary”.
“In some cases things that were just simply untrue,” he said.
“There was a story put out that in his absence, I had conspired with I don’t know who to postpone the implementation of Brexit – completely untrue.”
He concluded that a “fresh start” with a new cabinet secretary chosen by Johnson would be for the best and announced he would step down in June.
Lord Sedwill also told the inquiry he wanted Hancock sacked as health secretary.
He said that he did not formally advise Johnson to sack Hancock but the prime minister would have been “under no illusions” about his feelings.
He conceded that it was “clearly damaging” that multiple officials had lost confidence in the health secretary during an emergency such as a pandemic.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel