AN SNP councillor who used social media to brand Wings Over Scotland blogger Stuart Campbell “toxic” and “scum” has avoided suspension.
However, Fatima Joji, a Westhill and District councillor in Aberdeenshire, was censured by the Standards Commission for her comments.
Campbell alleged that Joji’s posts breached the Councillors’ Code of Conduct, specifically paragraph 3.1 that states councillors must treat everyone “with courtesy and respect”, even when using social media.
The complaint came before watchdogs on Monday.
Panel members had to decide whether Joji was acting in her capacity as a councillor, and whether her comments breached the code.
READ MORE: Wings Over Scotland returns to Twitter as Elon Musk takeover sees ban end
The SNP member was not present at the online hearing, but she was represented by solicitor Scott Martin.
Last July, Campbell tweeted about the then-Conservative party leadership candidate Kemi Badenoch.
He stated Badenoch was a “young black female working-class immigrant” and could be a good candidate for the Conservative leadership.
Joji shared the post, writing: “I thought this clown was against identity politics.”
The hearing was told that Joji went on to claim that Campbell had harassed members of the SNP party who are from ethnic minority backgrounds.
Joji added that Campbell was “advocating for a Tory that pushes right wing policies from the economy to immigration”, leading him to respond: “You're really worryingly dense.”
Joji wrote back: “You’re really worryingly hypocritical scum.”
Campbell later argued that he had been saying Badenoch (above) was a good choice from a Tory perspective, but that he did not support her.
Joji also updated her Twitter biography with a sentence which read “Stu Campbell is toxic”, the hearing was told.
Campbell then published a blog post titled “A Little Respect” which included screenshots of the tweets from the Aberdeenshire councillor, who he labelled “hyperwoke”.
The post read: “The tweets were part of an extended tirade objecting to a tweet thread I’d posted about Tory leadership candidate Kemi Badenoch.”
In response to the report, Joji acknowledged that she had violated the councillors’ code.
She said: “I understand my use of language such as ‘scum’ and ‘toxic’ have contravened the code.
“It was not acceptable to use the language I did as an elected representative.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf responds to Joanna Cherry sharing 'abhorrent' Wings Over Scotland post
But Joji argued she wasn’t acting in her role as a councillor while posting the tweets in question.
She claimed that the tweets were made during the council’s summer recess and while she was on her lunch break at her other job.
However, the standards commission agreed she was acting as a councillor as the messages were made through her public social media account.
Panel members noted that Joji had been subjected to abuse, but believed her comments were “entirely inappropriate”.
The Westhill councillor faced suspension or even disqualification from her local authority role.
However the panel agreed to let Joji off lightly with a censure.
This means the Standards Commission has formally recorded its “severe and public disapproval” of her actions.
The decision will not affect her role as an Aberdeenshire councillor.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel