THE former editor of The Sun has been slammed for a tweet that has been described as ‘disgusting’ and ‘Islamophobic’.
Kelvin MacKenzie – who became editor of The Sun in 1981 before leaving in 1994 – said on Twitter/X that he loved watching Labour leader Keir Starmer get “humiliated by the increasingly powerful and militant Muslim wing of his party”.
He then added: “If you want a party run by a religion which embraces baby killers, granny murderers and mass slaughterers it will be Labour for you next Autumn.”
READ MORE: Kelvin MacKenzie told to 'grow up' after offensive Nicola Sturgeon comments
It comes after Starmer met Muslim MPs and peers straight after PMQs on Wednesday, following backlash to the leader’s comments on LBC radio where he appeared to suggest Israel has the right to cut off power and water to Gaza. Asked if that was appropriate, Starmer said: “I think that Israel does have that right.”
The 77-year-old was swiftly condemned, with the post’s visibility then limited as it “may violate X’s rules against hateful conduct”.
Radio and TV presenter Matthew Stadlen said it was a “disgusting tweet”, to which MacKenzie replied: “Thank you.”
Another user asked: “Is this not racist and Islamophobic hate speech?”
It shows how tolerated Islamophobia is in the British media that a senior figure like Mackenzie can regularly make comments like this one, which in this case is so grim that even Musk's Twitter felt it had to intervene, and he's still invited back time and again on TV and radio. pic.twitter.com/4FdqQZRrXg
— Adam Bienkov (@AdamBienkov) October 25, 2023
Adam Bienkov, political editor at Byline Times, added: “It shows how tolerated Islamophobia is in the British media that a senior figure like Mackenzie can regularly make comments like this one, which in this case is so grim that even Musk's Twitter felt it had to intervene, and he's still invited back time and again on TV and radio.”
MacKenzie, who was also a columnist for The Sun until 2017, was let go for comparing a young mixed-race footballer to “a gorilla in the zoo”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel